Why Conduct BGV Of Companies? Lessons From A Recent Fraud

In a recent case of surprising events, a company once hailed for its meteoric rise in the renewable energy space has now been at the centre of a massive fraud scandal, leaving investors in shock and financial distress. The firm, known for its impressive growth trajectory and bold promises, was revealed to have engaged in dubious financial practices, resulting in a dramatic collapse. For anyone looking to invest or partner with such companies, this is a stark reminder of the critical importance of verifying a company’s financial and operational health before making any business decisions.

The sequence of events that led to this scandal highlights several key red flags that investors and regulatory authorities missed. From inflated financial statements to questionable governance practices, this case showcases why thorough company verification, including thorough checks like MCA verification, is essential. In this blog, we will explore the details of the fraud, how it unfolded, and why company verification is the best safeguard against such risks.

The Sequence Of Events: How The Fraud Unfolded

The Rise Of The Firm In Clean Energy And Sustainable Mobility

The company at the centre of this scandal had once been hailed as a leading innovator in India’s clean energy and electric vehicle (EV) sectors. With bold promises of transforming urban mobility through sustainable solutions, the firm quickly gained attention. Specialising in electric vehicles, battery technology, and charging infrastructure, the company attracted significant investments from both domestic and international investors.

By early 2024, the company’s stock price had risen dramatically, making it a prominent name in India’s green tech ecosystem. Its ambitious plans and rapid growth positioned it as a leading figure in the electric mobility space, with high expectations for long-term success.

Financial Irregularities And Mismanagement

However, despite its apparent success, the company soon showed signs of financial mismanagement. Investigations revealed that substantial funds intended for EV fleet expansion were diverted for personal use by the company’s executives. The firm had secured a loan of ₹663 crore from public-sector lenders to purchase and lease electric vehicles. These vehicles were supposed to be used by a ride-hailing service in India, which was a partner of the firm.

Unfortunately, a significant portion of the loan was misallocated. While the company had claimed that the loan would support the expansion of the electric vehicle fleet, funds were instead redirected towards luxury real estate purchases and other personal expenses of the executives. This mismanagement sparked serious concerns about the company’s financial integrity and its leadership’s role in the fraud.

Talk to sales - AuthBridge

Regulatory Actions And Credit Rating Downgrades

In response to the growing concerns and multiple whistleblower reports, regulators began to take action. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) intervened in April 2025, issuing an interim order to suspend the company’s promoters from holding positions in the firm and from participating in the securities market. SEBI’s investigation found that the company had defaulted on loans totalling approximately ₹978 crore, with no clear path to repayment.

In light of these developments, CARE Ratings — one of India’s leading credit rating agencies — took the drastic step of downgrading the company’s rating from AA to D, reflecting its inability to meet obligations and signalling financial default. This downgrade sent shockwaves through the market, significantly impacting investor confidence. The company’s stock price plummeted by more than 90%.

Operational Disruption And Asset Seizure

As the company’s financial situation worsened, operations with its key business partners, particularly those reliant on its electric vehicle fleet, came to a halt. This disruption in the service provider’s operations, coupled with a cessation of lease payments, further deepened the financial strain. Public sector lenders, fearing that the company’s loan account would soon become a non-performing asset (NPA), began preparing to auction off the electric vehicles that had been leased out as collateral for the loans.

This move to sell off assets was a last-ditch effort by the lenders to recover the outstanding loan amounts, but it also marked the beginning of the end for the company’s operations in the clean energy space.

Leadership Failures And Governance Issues

At the heart of the crisis was a complete breakdown of corporate governance. The company’s leadership, particularly the actions of the executives at the top, allowed these fraudulent activities to continue unchecked for months. There were no effective mechanisms in place to monitor and prevent financial mismanagement. Despite early warning signs, the company’s board of directors failed to take timely action, further compounding the damage.

As the crisis escalated, several senior executives were forced to resign. This included individuals who had been closely associated with the company’s financial decisions. The failure to perform adequate background checks and leadership due diligence allowed these individuals to operate with little accountability, ultimately leading to the company’s collapse.

The Importance Of Company Verification And Leadership Integrity

The Case For Thorough Company Verification

This recent collapse of a high-profile company in the clean energy and electric vehicle (EV) sector has brought to light a key lesson for investors, businesses, and financial professionals alike: thorough company verification is non-negotiable. The company rose rapidly through the ranks, attracting substantial capital and promising to transform India’s green energy space. However, behind its meteoric rise, financial mismanagement and corporate misgovernance were lurking, eventually causing its downfall.

Investors and stakeholders alike were left reeling when it was revealed that the company’s financial statements had been manipulated, with inflated revenues and misappropriated funds. This could have been identified sooner with thorough MCA verification. Through detailed checks into a company’s financial history, legal compliance, and corporate records, businesses and investors can uncover key red flags—discrepancies that indicate potential risks, such as unreported liabilities, excessive debt, or mismanagement of assets.

Leadership Integrity For Sound Corporate Governance

While company verification offers an essential foundation, leadership verification is just as important when it comes to safeguarding business interests. The firm involved in this scandal offers a strong case study in how poor leadership oversight and a lack of corporate governance contributed to the misuse of funds and fraudulent reporting. The executives who managed the company failed to provide adequate checks, allowing the fraudulent activities to persist unchecked.

Leadership verification is essential for ensuring that the individuals at the top of an organisation have a proven track record of financial responsibility, ethical decision-making, and sound governance. When verifying a company, it’s just as important to verify those who lead it. Background checks on key executives, including assessments of their past roles, criminal histories, and business dealings, help ensure that an organisation’s leadership is aligned with best practices in corporate governance and ethical conduct.

Proper leadership checks can serve as an early warning system, alerting stakeholders to risks tied to individuals who might be involved in unethical practices or prior financial misconduct.

How AuthBridge’s Verification Services Mitigate Risk

At AuthBridge, we recognise the key role that both company verification and leadership verification play in protecting investors and business partners from fraud. Our comprehensive MCA Verification service goes beyond basic checks by providing detailed insights into a company’s legal standing, financial compliance, and corporate governance practices. With MCA verification, businesses can ensure that they are engaging with firms that are legally compliant and financially sound, reducing the risk of engaging in partnerships with companies that have hidden liabilities or fraudulent practices.

In addition, our Leadership Verification service offers an in-depth assessment of the senior executives running an organisation. We provide background checks on individuals, including criminal records, business history, and any past involvement in financial misconduct. This ensures that key decision-makers have a history of ethical conduct and financial prudence, giving you confidence that your business partner is someone who can be trusted to act in the company’s long-term interest.

AML-stage

The Three Stages Of Money Laundering

Introduction

From drug trafficking and organised crime to tax evasion and corruption, financial crime thrives when illegal proceeds are successfully disguised as lawful income. At the heart of this deception lies the practice of money laundering—a calculated process that allows criminals to obscure the origin of their wealth and reintegrate it into the mainstream economy.

While the methods used may vary across regions, industries, and technologies, the laundering process typically follows a well-established pattern. Whether through shell companies, real estate investments, offshore accounts, or cryptocurrencies, criminals rely on a three-stage structure to move illicit funds: Placement, Layering, and Integration.

Each stage plays a distinct role in weakening financial oversight and concealing criminal footprints. Understanding these stages is essential not only for compliance professionals but also for policymakers, law enforcement, and financial institutions looking to disrupt the cycle before the funds are legitimised.

Money Laundering Stage 1: Placement

Placement is the first and most vulnerable stage of the money laundering process. It involves introducing illicit funds—typically large sums of cash—into the legal financial system. At this point, the money is most exposed to detection, making it a critical point for law enforcement and financial institutions to intervene.

Criminals seek to physically deposit or convert illegal cash into less suspicious forms while avoiding arousing attention. This may be done gradually in small amounts or through multiple entry points to avoid triggering regulatory thresholds or automated red flags.

Common Placement Techniques

  • Cash Deposits into Bank Accounts:
    Depositing small amounts into multiple accounts—a method often referred to as smurfing or structuring—is used to avoid mandatory reporting limits. In many jurisdictions, deposits exceeding a certain threshold (e.g., ₹10 lakh in India or $10,000 in the US) must be reported.

  • Purchasing High-Value Goods:
    Illicit funds are sometimes used to purchase expensive items like luxury watches, cars, jewellery, or even artwork, which can later be sold and the funds reintroduced as clean money.

  • Casino Transactions:
    Criminals may buy chips with dirty money, gamble minimally, and then cash out the chips, claiming the funds as gambling winnings.

  • Real Estate Down Payments or Rentals:
    Placing illegal funds into real estate—either as deposits or rental payments—is another way to gain initial legitimacy.

Why Placement Is High Risk

This stage presents the highest risk for criminals because the source of funds is still directly traceable to criminal activity. As a result, financial institutions play a crucial role in identifying suspicious deposits, cash-heavy transactions, or patterns that deviate from a customer’s known profile. Tools such as cash transaction reports (CTR) and suspicious transaction reports (STR) are instrumental in detecting anomalies at this stage.

Money Laundering Stage 2: Layering

Once illicit funds have been successfully placed into the financial system, the second stage—Layering—begins. This phase is designed to obscure the origin and ownership of the money by creating multiple layers of financial transactions that make tracing the source exceedingly difficult for investigators.

Layering is essentially a game of deception. The goal is to move funds through a series of complex, often international transactions, which can include converting money into different currencies, transferring it between multiple accounts, and engaging in elaborate trades—all with the intent of breaking the audit trail.

Common Layering Techniques

  • Wire Transfers Across Jurisdictions:
    Criminals often transfer funds between accounts in different countries, especially those with relatively lenient AML regulations. These transfers are structured to avoid raising suspicion and to exploit gaps in cross-border enforcement.

  • Use of Shell Companies and Front Businesses:
    Fake or inactive companies with minimal operations may be used to issue fictitious invoices, enabling illegal funds to move under the guise of legitimate business transactions.

  • Investing in Securities or Commodities:
    Purchasing and quickly reselling financial instruments or precious metals provides a way to further mask the money trail.

  • Converting Funds into Cryptocurrencies:
    Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Monero offer an added layer of anonymity and are increasingly used to shuffle funds beyond the reach of traditional oversight.

The Complexity Of Detection

Layering is deliberately complex. Unlike placement, which deals with physical cash, layering operates within digital financial systems—often in real time—making it harder to detect. Financial institutions must rely on behavioural analytics, AI-driven transaction monitoring, and cross-border data collaboration to uncover suspicious movement.

Moreover, because layering often mimics legitimate international business behaviour, compliance teams must be adept at spotting inconsistencies in transaction purpose, volume, frequency, and counterparty details.

Money Laundering Stage 3: Integration

Integration is the final stage in the money laundering process, where illicit funds re-enter the legitimate economy in a manner that makes them appear legally earned. At this point, the laundered money is typically indistinguishable from legitimate income, allowing criminals to use it freely for investment, business expansion, or personal enrichment.

This stage is the culmination of successful placement and layering. If both prior stages are executed without detection, the proceeds are now fully assimilated into the financial system—posing the greatest threat to economic and institutional integrity.

Common Integration Techniques

  • Investment in Real Estate or Businesses:
    One of the most popular methods of integration involves purchasing property or injecting capital into legitimate businesses. These assets can then generate genuine revenue, further masking the origin of the initial funds.

  • Lending Schemes or Loans to Self-Controlled Entities:
    Criminals may loan the cleaned money to their own businesses or associates, creating a paper trail that justifies the funds as legitimate earnings or debt repayments.

  • Luxury Asset Acquisitions:
    At this stage, individuals may buy high-end items—artwork, luxury vehicles, yachts, or jewellery—using money that now carries a clean paper trail.

  • Fake Contracts and Salary Payments:
    Another tactic involves setting up sham employment or consultancy arrangements, wherein the criminal receives regular “salary” payments that originate from the laundered funds.

Why Integration Is So Dangerous

By the time money reaches the integration stage, its criminal origin is often obscured beyond recognition. Traditional compliance systems may struggle to detect anything unusual unless previous red flags were raised and investigated. As a result, proactive monitoring, continuous due diligence, and retrospective transaction audits are essential for spotting patterns even after integration has occurred.

This is also where tax evasion, insider trading, and political corruption often intersect with money laundering—making it crucial for banks and regulators to scrutinise the financial activities of high-net-worth individuals, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and businesses with opaque financial flows.

Conclusion

Money laundering is not a random act—it is a structured, multi-phase process that allows criminals to embed illicit wealth within the global economy. Each of the three stages—Placement, Layering, and Integration—plays a vital role in disguising the origins of illegal funds and enabling them to re-enter legitimate financial channels.

For banks, regulators, and compliance professionals, understanding these stages is more than a theoretical exercise; it is the foundation for building effective Anti-Money Laundering (AML) frameworks. Intervening early—especially during the placement stage—can dramatically reduce the chance of financial crime success. However, it is equally critical to detect and investigate layering tactics and integration signals, which often go unnoticed in the absence of sophisticated analytics and continuous monitoring.

With financial crimes becoming more advanced and decentralised, especially through the use of cryptocurrencies, shell entities, and cross-border layering techniques, institutions must evolve their AML capabilities. This includes not only leveraging AI and behavioural analytics but also strengthening due diligence, data integration, and reporting mechanisms.

The more deeply financial institutions understand how money laundering works, the better equipped they will be to disrupt it—protecting the integrity of the financial system and supporting broader efforts to combat organised crime.

aml-inbanking-blog-image

AML In Banking: Trends, Challenges And The Road Ahead

Introduction

Money laundering remains one of the most pressing threats to the global financial ecosystem. As illicit funds flow through legitimate financial institutions, banks increasingly find themselves on the front lines of the battle against financial crime. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), between 2% and 5% of global GDP, roughly $800 billion to $2 trillion laundered every year. These staggering figures underscore the critical role of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) efforts in the banking sector.

AML in banking refers to a suite of laws, policies, technologies, and internal practices designed to detect, prevent, and report suspicious financial activity. With digital banking and cross-border transactions on the rise, traditional methods of AML enforcement are proving insufficient. In response, financial institutions are turning to advanced analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and regulatory technology (RegTech) to stay ahead of evolving threats.

The need for robust AML frameworks has never been more urgent. Global watchdogs such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and national regulators are intensifying scrutiny, issuing heavy penalties for non-compliance. In 2022 alone, financial institutions across the globe faced over $5 billion in AML-related fines, highlighting the real financial and reputational risks involved.

The Evolution Of AML In Banking

Anti-Money Laundering regulations have evolved significantly over the past few decades, transitioning from basic record-keeping requirements to sophisticated risk-based frameworks integrated with cutting-edge technology. In India, the evolution of AML practices can be traced back to the enactment of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in 2002. This legislation laid the groundwork for modern AML protocols, empowering regulatory bodies to tackle financial crimes more proactively.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) further strengthened compliance by issuing guidelines for banks and financial institutions to implement robust Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures. Over time, these mandates expanded to include transaction monitoring, suspicious activity reporting (SAR), and the creation of internal AML cells within banks. The RBI’s push towards digitisation has only accelerated this evolution.

Globally, AML enforcement gained momentum with the establishment of the FATF in 1989, followed by widespread adoption of its recommendations. In India, FATF’s mutual evaluations have driven the banking sector to align closely with global standards. The introduction of the Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND) has also been pivotal in enabling the collection and analysis of financial data related to money laundering.

With the advent of fintech and increasing reliance on digital payment systems such as UPI, NEFT, and mobile wallets, the complexity of financial ecosystems in India has deepened. This shift has led to a new era of AML, where banks are no longer simply watchdogs—they are data-driven sentinels relying on real-time surveillance, behaviour analytics, and machine learning models to detect financial crime.

Key Challenges In AML For Banks

  • High Transaction Volumes:
    Banks must monitor millions of transactions daily, making it difficult to detect suspicious patterns in real time.

  • False Positives in Monitoring:
    Rule-based systems often generate excessive alerts, most of which are false positives—wasting time and resources on manual reviews.

  • Fragmented Data Systems:
    Customer and transaction data are often siloed across departments, preventing a unified risk view and effective monitoring.

  • Evolving Laundering Techniques:
    Criminals exploit cryptocurrencies, shell companies, and complex layering methods that traditional AML systems struggle to track.

  • Balancing Compliance and Customer Experience:
    Banks must enforce strong AML measures without creating friction for legitimate customers expecting fast and seamless service.

Regulatory Expectations And Compliance Frameworks In 2025

As financial crime grows more complex, regulatory authorities worldwide are stepping up expectations from banks to ensure robust AML compliance. The focus has shifted from mere policy adherence to demonstrable, outcome-based risk management.

Below are the key regulatory expectations shaping the AML landscape in 2025:

  • Risk-Based Approach (RBA):
    Regulators now demand that AML programmes be tailored to the specific risk exposure of a financial institution. This includes customer risk profiling, transaction risk scoring, and sectoral risk evaluation. One-size-fits-all compliance is no longer acceptable.

  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD):
    Institutions are expected to conduct EDD for high-risk customers such as politically exposed persons (PEPs), offshore entities, and businesses operating in high-risk jurisdictions. This involves collecting more detailed documentation and ongoing monitoring of account activity.

  • Real-Time Transaction Monitoring:
    Regulatory bodies are emphasising the need for continuous, real-time transaction monitoring using AI-powered systems, rather than relying solely on post-facto reviews. This ensures timely reporting of suspicious activities.

  • Robust Record-Keeping & Audit Trails:
    Financial institutions must maintain digital audit trails and comprehensive records of all customer interactions, transactions, and compliance reviews for a minimum of five years, as per FATF and local jurisdictional standards.

  • Integrated KYC-AML Compliance:
    Regulators are pushing for tighter integration between Know Your Customer (KYC) and AML functions. KYC data should feed directly into AML decision-making systems to enable more accurate risk assessments and fraud detection.

  • Automated Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR):
    Compliance teams must implement automated SAR generation and filing mechanisms that align with local formats (e.g., STRs in India). Delays or manual handling of such reports could result in hefty penalties.

  • Third-Party & Vendor Risk Management:
    AML regulations now extend to third-party due diligence, requiring financial institutions to assess the risk profiles of vendors and partners, especially in outsourcing arrangements for KYC, collections, or onboarding.

  • Cross-Border Compliance Alignment:
    For banks operating in multiple geographies, there is a growing need to harmonise their AML processes with both local and international regulatory frameworks (e.g., EU’s AMLD6, USA’s Bank Secrecy Act, India’s PMLA).

These frameworks are not just compliance mandates—they reflect a broader shift towards accountability, transparency, and proactive financial crime prevention.

Future Trends In AML For Banks

As financial crime continues to evolve, AML strategies must advance in parallel. The future of Anti-Money Laundering in banking will be defined by agility, automation, and intelligence. Financial institutions are no longer reactive entities; they are expected to predict and pre-empt risks before they escalate. Below are the key trends poised to shape AML practices in the years ahead:

  • Agentic AI and Autonomous Compliance Systems
    Agentic AI, which enables systems to act independently to complete tasks, is set to redefine AML operations. From initiating verification checks to closing compliance loops, autonomous agents will minimise human intervention while accelerating resolution times and boosting accuracy.

  • Holistic Identity Resolution
    AML efforts will increasingly depend on unified identity frameworks that consolidate data from multiple sources—HRMS, onboarding platforms, digital IDS, and external databases—into a single, verifiable customer profile. This helps in identifying risk at both the individual and network levels.

  • Behavioural Biometrics and Advanced Risk Scoring
    Financial institutions will begin leveraging behavioural analytics, such as typing patterns, device usage, and navigation behaviour, to build predictive risk scores. These scores will complement traditional KYC data to uncover anomalies early in the transaction lifecycle.

  • Global Data Collaboration and Utility Models
    To combat transnational money laundering, regulators and banks will embrace collaborative platforms and shared intelligence frameworks. The adoption of KYC utilities, centralised AML databases, and real-time information exchange will gain momentum.

  • RegTech-Driven AML Orchestration
    Regulatory Technology (RegTech) will enable end-to-end orchestration of AML compliance—right from data capture and screening to real-time reporting and audit readiness. API-first, cloud-native platforms will become the gold standard in compliance infrastructure.

  • Sustainability-Linked AML Risk Assessments
    ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) considerations are beginning to influence AML strategy. Banks will start integrating ESG risk factors into AML assessments, particularly for industries linked to environmental crime, human trafficking, or corruption.

  • Zero-Trust Architecture for AML Systems
    With increasing cybersecurity threats, AML platforms will be built using zero-trust principles—ensuring every access point, user, and dataset is authenticated, authorised, and monitored at all times.

These trends collectively point to a future where AML is intelligent, automated, and deeply integrated into every layer of banking infrastructure. For banks willing to adapt, the opportunity lies not just in compliance—but in gaining a strategic edge.

Conclusion

Anti-Money Laundering is no longer just a regulatory obligation—it is a cornerstone of institutional integrity and risk management. In an age of real-time transactions, global digital banking, and sophisticated criminal networks, AML must evolve from reactive compliance to proactive defence.

Banks today are faced with an unprecedented dual challenge: safeguarding against financial crime while ensuring seamless customer experiences. The only viable path forward is through innovation—leveraging AI, automation, and integrated compliance frameworks that offer both agility and accountability.

Regulatory expectations will continue to rise, and penalties for non-compliance will grow increasingly severe. But for banks that choose to invest in modern, data-driven AML systems, the benefits go beyond regulatory safety. They gain reputational trust, operational efficiency, and the ability to stay one step ahead in a constantly shifting financial landscape.

Banking Amendment Laws 2025

Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2025: All Key Highlights

On 15th April 2025, the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2025 received the assent of the President, marking a watershed moment in India’s banking history. This amendment significantly changes several foundational banking statutes, including the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the State Bank of India Act, 1955, and the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Acts of 1970 and 1980.

The amendments are part of an ongoing effort to streamline and modernise the regulatory framework governing India’s banking sector. The changes address a range of issues, from the handling of unclaimed deposits to the governance of banking institutions, aiming to enhance operational efficiency, transparency, and regulatory oversight.

These revisions come at a time when India’s banking sector is undergoing digital transformation, and the need for updated and stronger laws has never been greater. As the economy becomes more digitally connected, ensuring that banking laws adapt to meet new challenges is crucial for maintaining stability and fostering growth.

Key Highlights Of The Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2025

The Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2025, brings forward several significant amendments aimed at refining and modernising India’s banking landscape. The changes affect various critical acts, including the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the State Bank of India Act, 1955, and the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Acts of 1970 and 1980. Below is an overview of the amendments.

1. Amendment to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934

  • Fortnight Definition:
    • The definition of “fortnight” has been updated to mean the period from the 1st to the 15th day of each calendar month, or from the 16th to the last day of the month. This clarification will standardise timelines for operational activities, enhancing consistency across financial operations.
  • Operational Timelines:
    • The amendment replaces the term “alternate Friday” with “last day of each fortnight”, streamlining how banking operations are scheduled. This update also changes the previous reference to “seven days” for operational timelines, reducing it to “five days” for certain compliance activities, improving operational efficiency.

2. Amendment to the Banking Regulation Act, 1949

  • Minimum Capital Requirement:
    • The minimum capital required for certain banking activities has been increased significantly from five lakhs of rupees to two crore rupees or an amount notified by the Central Government in the Official Gazette.
  • Directorial Tenure in Cooperative Banks:
    • The amendment revises the tenure for directors of cooperative banks. Directors can now serve up to ten years, extending the previous limit of eight years. This is aimed at fostering stability in management at cooperative banks.
  • Nomination Changes:
    • Multiple Nominees:
      • The Act now allows up to four nominees to be nominated for a single account or deposit. If more than one nominee is chosen, the proportion of the share for each nominee must be specified.
      • In the event of a nominee’s death, the nomination for that individual becomes invalid, and the remaining shares will be redistributed according to the remaining valid nominees.
    • Successive and Simultaneous Nominations:
      • The Act distinguishes between successive and simultaneous nominations.
      • Successive nominations will take effect in a specified order, starting with the first nominee. If the first nominee is no longer available, the next in line will take precedence, and so on.
      • Simultaneous nominations require that the proportionate share of the amount be stated explicitly. Each of the nominees’ shares will be paid out in the proportions specified by the account holder.
    • If the account holder does not specify proportions, the nomination will be rendered invalid.
    • Nomination for Locker Holders:
      • When it comes to lockers, the Act now allows up to four nominees for a single locker. The proportion of access to the locker’s contents can be specified for each nominee. In case the locker holder dies, the nominees will gain access according to the order of priority.

3. Amendment to the State Bank of India Act, 1955

  • Unclaimed Funds and Dividends:
    • In line with the reforms, the State Bank of India Act, 1955 requires that unclaimed dividends, unpaid money, and unclaimed shares be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF) after seven years.
    • This ensures better accountability and ensures that dormant funds are handled in a transparent manner. Shareholders can claim their unpaid dividends or funds from the IEPF.
  • Auditor Remuneration:
    • The Act has been amended to align with the Companies Act, 2013, with the State Bank now required to fix auditor remuneration according to the guidelines of the modern regulatory framework.

4. Amendment to the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and 1980

  • Unclaimed Funds:
    • Similar to the provisions in the State Bank of India Act, unclaimed funds from acquired banks will now be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund after seven years.
  • Simplified Dividend Procedures:
    • Unpaid dividends, shares, and other forms of unpaid money must be transferred to the IEPF, ensuring that dormant assets are properly managed and that no assets remain unaccounted for.

5. Nomination and Inheritance Changes

  • Multiple Nominees (Up to Four):
    • A critical change introduced is the maximum number of nominees allowed. The law now permits the nomination of up to four individuals, either successively or simultaneously.
    • For successive nominations, the order of priority must be clear. The first nominee will be given precedence, followed by the second nominee if the first one passes away, and so on.
    • For simultaneous nominations, the proportions of the total amount each nominee is entitled to must be clearly stated. If this proportion is not specified, the nomination will be considered invalid.
  • Locker Nomination Provisions:
    • In the case of locker holders, a depositor can nominate up to four individuals. The proportion of the locker’s contents assigned to each nominee must be stated explicitly. If a nominee passes away before accessing the locker, the rights to that portion will lapse, and the remaining nominees will take precedence.
    • The nomination rules for lockers mirror those for deposits, ensuring clarity in the event of the locker holder’s death.
  • Changes to Nomination Inheritance:
    • In case of multiple nominees, the priority follows a clear order of succession:
      • The first nominee’s right is activated if they survive the account holder(s).
      • If the first nominee passes away, the second nominee’s rights will come into play, followed by the third, and so on. This systematic order eliminates confusion over the rights of the nominees and ensures clarity regarding the inheritance of banking assets.

6. Other Key Amendments

  • Operational Days and Terms:
    • The amendment also introduces changes in operational days: references to alternate Fridays have been replaced with the last day of the fortnight, ensuring consistency in banking practices.
  • Cooperative Bank Management:
    • The amendment permits directors of central cooperative banks to be elected to the boards of state cooperative banks where they are members, enhancing governance and cooperation between institutions.
  • Simplification of Procedures:
    • There are several provisions aimed at simplifying operational and procedural requirements for banks, particularly in relation to unclaimed funds and handling shares, ensuring smoother transactions and compliance with modern financial regulations.

When Will The New Banking Law Amendments Come Into Effect?

The Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2025, is set to be implemented in phases. While the Act received Presidential assent on 15th April 2025, its provisions will come into force on a date to be notified by the Central Government.

As stated in the Act, different provisions of the amendment will come into force on different dates. This means that while some provisions will take effect immediately, others may be implemented over time, based on the requirements and readiness of the regulatory authorities, financial institutions, and businesses involved.

It is important to note that once the provisions come into force, any reference in the Act to its commencement will refer to the specific dates when each provision is activated.

What Does This Mean for Banks and Consumers?

For banks, the implementation of the Act will require them to update their operational procedures to reflect the changes in nomination rules, fund management, and governance structures. Banks will need to ensure that their systems and customer interactions align with the new provisions, such as the acceptance of multiple nominees and the transfer of unclaimed funds to the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF).

For consumers, this phased implementation means they will need to stay informed about the changes, especially regarding nominee designations, unclaimed funds, and any updates to their banking accounts or lockers. Consumers should expect communication from their banks regarding these changes and may be required to update their account details to comply with the new rules.

The Central Government will issue a notification in the Official Gazette specifying the exact dates for the commencement of these provisions. Once the notifications are issued, the banking sector will be fully equipped to implement the changes as per the new legal framework.

To ensure you’re fully prepared for these changes, it’s crucial to:

  • Review your banking accounts: Check the nomination details, ensure you have named sufficient nominees, and update your personal information if needed.

  • Stay informed: Keep an eye out for notifications from your bank regarding implementation dates and necessary actions on your part.

  • Engage with your bank: If you have any questions about how the amendments will affect your accounts, do not hesitate to reach out to your financial institution for clarity.

Conclusion

The Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2025, is a clear sign that India’s banking sector is evolving to meet modern challenges and global standards. By understanding and adapting to these new laws, you can ensure that your financial dealings remain secure, efficient, and compliant.

Know-Yor-Patient-blog-image

Know Your Patient (KYP): What It Is & Why Healthcare Needs It?

What Is Know Your Patient (KYP)?

Know Your Patient (KYP) is a process that helps healthcare providers verify a patient’s identity before offering medical care. It ensures that the right person gets the right treatment, prescription, or insurance benefits while protecting healthcare systems from fraud and identity theft.

Today, when telemedicine, online pharmacies, and digital health records are fast-growing, KYP plays a crucial role in ensuring that patient information is accurate and secure.

Without proper identity verification, fraudsters can misuse healthcare services—claiming insurance benefits that don’t belong to them, getting prescriptions under a false identity, or accessing medical care without proper documentation. This doesn’t just cause financial losses; it can also lead to serious life-threatening medical errors if the wrong records are linked to the wrong person.

By verifying identities through government-issued IDs, biometrics, or electronic health records (EHRs), KYP helps healthcare providers build trust, improve patient safety, and stay compliant with regulations. It ensures that medical decisions are based on accurate, verified information, making healthcare safer and more reliable for everyone.

Why Is KYP Important in Healthcare?

Today, when healthcare is increasingly getting digital, verifying patient identities has become a necessity. Know Your Patient (KYP) ensures that medical services are delivered to the right person, prevents fraud, and safeguards sensitive health data. Without proper verification, healthcare systems are vulnerable to identity theft, insurance fraud, and medical errors that could put lives at risk.

One of the biggest challenges in healthcare is patient misidentification. Take an example of a scenario where a hospital mistakenly pulls up the wrong medical records for a patient. This could lead to incorrect treatments, medication errors, and even life-threatening consequences. KYP reduces these risks by ensuring that every patient’s identity is accurately verified before any medical service is provided.

Healthcare fraud is another major concern. Fraudsters may use fake identities to claim insurance benefits, obtain prescriptions illegally, or manipulate medical records. According to reports, billions are lost every year due to healthcare fraud, increasing costs for both providers and patients. KYP helps combat this by adding a layer of security, ensuring that only legitimate patients access medical services.

With the rise of telemedicine and online pharmacies, verifying patient identities is more important than ever. Unlike traditional hospital visits, where staff can physically check an ID, digital healthcare services rely on online identity verification methods. Without KYP, unauthorised individuals could misuse telehealth services, leading to privacy breaches and regulatory violations.

Regulatory compliance is another key reason why KYP matters. Laws like HIPAA (USA), GDPR (EU), and the National Digital Health Mission (NDHM) in India require healthcare providers to protect patient data. Failing to verify identities properly can lead to legal penalties, reputational damage, and loss of patient trust.

How Does KYP Work?

The Know Your Patient (KYP) process ensures that healthcare providers accurately verify a patient’s identity before offering medical care, prescriptions, or insurance benefits. It typically involves multiple verification steps, using both digital and physical identity checks to prevent fraud and misidentification.

1. Patient Registration & Identity Verification

When a patient registers at a hospital, clinic, or telemedicine platform, they must provide identification details such as:

  • Government-issued IDs (passport, Aadhaar, driving licence, NHS number, etc.)
  • Biometric verification (fingerprint or facial recognition)
  • Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to match previous medical history

In digital healthcare platforms like telemedicine or online pharmacies, patients may need to upload an ID and undergo additional verification, such as video-based KYP (VKYP), OTP authentication, or AI-powered document verification.

2. Cross-Checking Patient Data

Once the identity details are provided, the system cross-checks them against national health databases, insurance records, and hospital information systems. This helps in:

  • Ensuring medical records are correctly linked to the patient
  • Detecting any fraudulent attempts using fake or stolen identities
  • Verifying insurance eligibility before claims are processed

For instance, if someone tries to access healthcare benefits under a stolen identity, KYP systems can flag discrepancies in name, age, or medical history.

3. Insurance & Prescription Validation

KYP is also crucial for verifying health insurance claims and prescription drug purchases. Many fraudsters use fake identities to claim expensive medical treatments or obtain prescription drugs illegally.

  • Before approving an insurance claim, providers check if the patient’s identity and medical records match the details provided to the insurance company.
  • Pharmacies use KYP to verify prescriptions, ensuring that controlled medications like opioids are only dispensed to legitimate patients.

4. Ongoing Monitoring & Fraud Prevention

Healthcare fraud is constantly evolving, which is why KYP is not a one-time process. AI-powered fraud detection tools monitor patient activities over time to:

  • Identify suspicious patterns (e.g., frequent name or address changes in medical records)
  • Detect multiple identity use for insurance fraud or drug abuse
  • Prevent duplicate medical records that can lead to misdiagnosis

Benefits of KYP for Healthcare Providers & Patients

The Know Your Patient (KYP) process is not just about verifying identities—it plays a crucial role in making healthcare safer, more efficient, and fraud-free. Both healthcare providers and patients benefit from a robust KYP system, as it ensures accurate records, prevents identity theft, and improves the overall quality of care.

For Healthcare Providers: Enhancing Security & Compliance

  1. Prevents Medical Identity Fraud
    Healthcare fraud costs billions each year, with fraudsters using fake or stolen identities to access medical services, insurance claims, or prescription drugs. KYP helps detect and prevent these fraudulent activities by verifying patient identities in real time.
  2. Reduces Duplicate & Mismanaged Medical Records
    A common issue in hospitals and clinics is duplicate or mismatched records, leading to misdiagnosis, incorrect treatments, and medical errors. KYP ensures that every patient’s medical history is linked to the correct identity, improving accuracy in treatments.
  3. Ensures Compliance with Healthcare Regulations
    Laws like HIPAA (USA), GDPR (EU), and the National Digital Health Mission (India) require strict protection of patient data. KYP helps healthcare providers meet compliance requirements, reducing the risk of legal penalties and data breaches.
  4. Improves Insurance Processing & Reduces Claim Fraud
    Insurance fraud is a growing problem, with fake claims increasing costs for both providers and patients. KYP helps verify patient details before claims are processed, ensuring that only genuine patients receive benefits.
  5. Enhances Trust in Telemedicine & Online Healthcare
    As digital healthcare grows, so does the risk of fake identities in online consultations and e-pharmacies. KYP strengthens patient authentication in telemedicine, ensuring that only verified individuals can access medical services.

For Patients: Better Care & Greater Security

  1. Protects Against Identity Theft
    Many criminals use stolen personal details to access medical services or purchase prescription drugs illegally. KYP protects patients from such risks by ensuring that their medical records and insurance benefits are not misused.
  2. Ensures Accurate & Safe Medical Treatment
    When patient identities are verified correctly, doctors can access accurate medical histories, allergies, and prior treatments, reducing the chances of medical errors. This leads to safer and more effective treatments.
  3. Speeds Up Medical & Insurance Processes
    A verified patient identity ensures that hospital admissions, prescriptions, and insurance claims are processed quickly, reducing waiting times and unnecessary paperwork.
  4. Enhances Privacy & Data Protection
    With strict verification measures, patient data remains secure from unauthorised access, hacking, or misuse, giving patients peace of mind regarding their sensitive health information.
  5. Enables Secure Access to Digital Healthcare Services
    Whether booking an online consultation, receiving an e-prescription, or accessing digital health records, KYP ensures that patients’ identities are safeguarded in digital healthcare environments.

Challenges in Implementing KYP & How to Overcome Them

While Know Your Patient (KYP) is essential for secure and efficient healthcare, implementing it comes with challenges. Healthcare providers must balance security, compliance, and patient convenience while ensuring that the verification process remains accurate and seamless.

Patient Privacy Concerns & Data Protection

One of the biggest challenges in implementing KYP is ensuring that patient data remains private and protected. With stringent data protection laws like GDPR (Europe) and HIPAA (USA), healthcare providers must handle personal information responsibly. Patients may be hesitant to share biometric data or identity documents, fearing misuse or breaches.

Healthcare providers should implement end-to-end encryption and blockchain-based verification to keep patient data secure. Transparent privacy policies and patient consent management should also be in place to build trust.

Integration with Legacy Healthcare Systems

Many hospitals and clinics still rely on outdated software and manual record-keeping, making it difficult to integrate KYP solutions. Without proper system updates, verification processes can be slow and inefficient.

Adopting cloud-based and AI-powered KYP solutions allows for easy integration with existing hospital management systems (HMS) and electronic health records (EHRs). APIs can bridge the gap between legacy databases and modern verification tools.

Verifying Identities in Remote & Rural Areas

In many developing regions, patients may lack government-issued IDs or access to digital verification systems. This makes it challenging to implement strict KYP protocols, especially for telemedicine services in remote areas.

Implementing alternative verification methods such as facial recognition, voice biometrics, or national health ID cards linked to fingerprints can help address this challenge. Governments and healthcare providers can collaborate to digitise patient records and create verification-friendly ID systems.

Fraudsters Adapting to Verification Measures

As KYP measures become more sophisticated, fraudsters also evolve, using deepfake technology, fake medical records, and stolen identities to bypass security checks. Medical identity fraud remains a major concern, especially in telemedicine and online pharmacy platforms.

Healthcare providers should adopt AI-driven fraud detection tools that analyse behavioural patterns, detect anomalies in medical history, and flag suspicious identity usage in real time. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) can further strengthen security.

Ensuring a Seamless Patient Experience

While security is essential, KYP should not create unnecessary friction for patients. Complex or time-consuming verification steps can frustrate patients, leading to longer waiting times and reduced trust in healthcare services.

Healthcare providers should implement user-friendly KYP processes that automate verification using AI and machine learning. For example, video KYP (VKYP) or digital ID scanning can make identity verification quick and hassle-free.

High Costs of Implementation for Small Clinics & Pharmacies

Many small healthcare providers, clinics, and independent pharmacies may struggle to afford advanced KYP systems. Costly biometric scanners, software integrations, and compliance requirements can be a financial burden.

Cloud-based and subscription-based KYP solutions can reduce upfront costs while still offering secure verification. Governments and regulatory bodies can also provide subsidies and incentives for smaller healthcare providers to adopt KYP systems.

Conclusion

Know Your Patient (KYP) is no longer just an option—it is a necessity for secure and trustworthy healthcare. With the rise of digital health services, telemedicine, and online pharmacies, verifying patient identities is crucial to prevent fraud, protect sensitive medical data, and ensure accurate treatments.

By implementing AI-driven verification, biometrics, blockchain, and digital health IDs, healthcare providers can make KYP faster, safer, and more efficient. As regulations tighten and fraud risks increase, hospitals, clinics, and telehealth platforms must prioritise strong patient verification systems to build trust and improve healthcare security.

New Aadhaar Beta Testing App

New Aadhaar App Beta Version: Key Features, How To Download

In an age where digital services are omnipresent, security and efficiency in identity verification have never been more crucial. Over a billion Indians rely on the Aadhaar system for their digital identity, yet the process of authentication has remained filled with complexities and concerns around privacy. The new Aadhaar app, currently undergoing beta testing, promises to change this narrative.

This new Aadhaar app is designed to give Aadhaar number holders more control over their data. With this app, users can share only the information needed for specific services, ensuring complete privacy. The app enables digital verification and data sharing through a requesting application or by scanning a QR code, eliminating the need for physical photocopies.

A standout feature of the app is its integration of Aadhaar Face Authentication, which has quickly gained popularity and now handles over 15 crore transactions per month across various sectors.

New Aadhaar Beta App launch
Image Source: PIB.gov.in

The Key Features Of The New Aadhaar Mobile App

Facial Recognition

At the heart of the new Aadhaar app is the integration of facial recognition technology. This innovation allows users to authenticate their identity without the need for physical Aadhaar cards or even a fingerprint scan. With a simple face scan, users can verify their identity within seconds, making the entire process far quicker and more reliable.

Unlike traditional methods of verification, where documents can be forged or tampered with, facial recognition ensures that the person presenting their Aadhaar details is indeed the rightful owner of the identity. This is particularly crucial in combating identity theft and fraud, both of which have become growing concerns in a digital-first world.

QR Code-Based Authentication

For those looking for an even simpler method, the new Aadhaar app allows users to generate a dynamic QR code, which can be scanned by businesses, service providers, or government agencies. This QR code links directly to the user’s Aadhaar details and ensures a seamless authentication process without the need for physical documents. Whether at a retail counter or a government office, this feature speeds up the verification process, reducing waiting times and enhancing user experience.

The shift from paper-based verification to QR codes also marks a significant step towards reducing physical contact, a critical consideration in the post-pandemic world. Moreover, QR code-based authentication helps avoid issues such as data entry errors, which are common in manual verification methods.

Enhanced Privacy Controls

One of the primary concerns surrounding digital identity systems has always been privacy. The new Aadhaar app addresses this head-on by giving users control over what information they wish to share. With the app, individuals can choose to disclose only the essential details needed for verification, rather than handing over their entire Aadhaar data. This ensures that privacy is preserved and the risk of data misuse is minimised.

Additionally, the app’s reliance on biometric authentication—namely, facial recognition and QR codes—helps to ensure that sensitive data is not easily accessible to unauthorised parties. In a country like India, where data privacy laws are still evolving, this level of control could serve as a critical safeguard for millions of users.

Currently, the app is being released to a select group of early adopters, including all registered participants of the Aadhaar Samvaad event, where this update was showcased. UIDAI plans to expand access based on feedback from users and ecosystem partners.

Why This New Aadhaar Update Is Huge?

Streamlines the Verification Process

India’s digital transformation hinges on its ability to verify identities quickly and securely. The new Aadhaar app, by incorporating facial recognition and QR codes, simplifies what has traditionally been a cumbersome process. Whether applying for a loan, booking a train ticket, or verifying a bank account, the app makes the entire process faster, more reliable, and, most importantly, secure.

Moreover, the app’s user-friendly interface ensures that even those with minimal technical expertise can navigate through it effortlessly, bridging the digital divide that still exists in many parts of the country.

A Boost for Digital India

The rollout of the new Aadhaar app is also a crucial milestone in India’s ongoing journey to becoming a digital-first nation. As government services, banking, e-commerce, and healthcare continue to digitise, the demand for reliable, secure, and fast identity verification will only grow. The new Aadhaar app is well-positioned to meet this demand, offering a solution that is not only secure but also adaptable to the needs of an increasingly mobile and digitally literate population.

By digitising identity verification, the app also plays a significant role in reducing fraud and promoting transparency. Whether for government welfare schemes or private sector services, the app will ensure that the right person is getting access to the right benefits, minimising errors and, potentially, corruption.

A More Inclusive System for All

Another noteworthy aspect of the new Aadhaar app is its potential for inclusion. In a country as diverse as India, access to technology remains uneven. The app is designed to be accessible to all citizens, from those living in rural areas to urban dwellers, and works even on low-end smartphones. This broad accessibility will make it easier for a larger portion of the population to participate in the digital economy and gain access to essential services.

What’s Next for the New Aadhaar Mobile App?

Feedback from the beta testing will be crucial in fine-tuning the app before its national rollout. Once launched, the app is set to transform the way identity verification is done, making it faster, more secure, and more convenient than ever before.

As more sectors adopt this new form of authentication, we can expect to see a significant reduction in fraud, errors, and delays. Moreover, as India continues its march towards a fully digital future, the Aadhaar app will likely play an integral role in shaping the landscape of digital governance and service delivery.

How To Install The Beta mAadhaar App?

For Android Users:

  1. Open the Google Play Store:
    • Tap on the Play Store icon on your Android device.​
  2. Search for ‘mAadhaar’:
    • In the search bar, type ‘mAadhaar‘ and press Enter.​
  3. Install the App:
    • Locate the official mAadhaar app developed by UIDAI.​
    • Tap ‘Install’ to download and install the app on your device.​
  4. Set Up the App:
    • Open the mAadhaar app.​
    • Agree to the terms and conditions.​
    • Create a 4-digit PIN/Password for app access.​
    • Enter your 12-digit Aadhaar number and the captcha code.​
    • An OTP will be sent to your registered mobile number. Enter this OTP to verify.​
    • After verification, your profile will be created, and you can start using the app.​

For iOS Users:

  1. Open the App Store:
    • Tap on the App Store icon on your iOS device.​
  2. Search for ‘mAadhaar’:
    • In the search bar, type ‘mAadhaar‘ and press Enter.​
  3. Install the App:
    • Locate the official mAadhaar app developed by UIDAI.
    • Tap ‘Get’ to download and install the app on your device.​
  4. Set Up the App:
    • Open the mAadhaar app.​
    • Agree to the terms and conditions.​
    • Create a 4-digit PIN/Password for app access
    • Enter your 12-digit Aadhaar number and the captcha code.​
    • An OTP will be sent to your registered mobile number. Enter this OTP to verify.​
    • After verification, your profile will be created, and you can start using the app.​

Important Notes:

  • Registered Mobile Number: Ensure your Aadhaar is linked to your current mobile number, as OTP verification is required during the setup.​
  • App Permissions: Grant necessary permissions to the app for optimal functionality.​
  • Security: Keep your app PIN confidential to prevent unauthorized access.

Conclusion

In a country of over 1.3 billion people, efficient and secure identity verification is no small feat. The new Aadhaar app offers a solution that addresses both security and convenience, making it easier than ever for Indians to authenticate their identity. With its use of facial recognition, QR code authentication, and enhanced privacy controls, the app is set to redefine how identity verification is done in India. As it moves from beta testing to full rollout, the new Aadhaar app promises to be a cornerstone of India’s digital identity infrastructure for years to come.

UAN-activation-blog-image

EPFO Boosts UAN Activation With Aadhaar Face Authentication

In a significant step towards streamlining the experience for millions of Indian workers, the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), under the Ministry of Labour and Employment, has launched a pioneering initiative to make the UAN (Universal Account Number) generation and activation process both simpler and more secure. By integrating Aadhaar Face Authentication Technology (FAT) through the UMANG Mobile App, EPFO aims to empower employees directly, eliminating the need for intermediaries and addressing long-standing challenges.

Historically, the UAN system had been marred by issues such as incorrect or missing details, ranging from fathers’ names to mobile numbers, which often caused delays and confusion. Furthermore, the cumbersome process of UAN activation left many employees unable to access their EPFO services without additional intervention. The new Aadhaar FAT-based process marks a significant departure from this legacy. Not only does it promise to resolve these issues, but it also adds a layer of security through biometric verification, making it a truly digital solution for today’s tech-savvy workforce.

Simplifying UAN Generation And Activation For Employees

For employees, the process of obtaining and activating their Universal Account Number (UAN) has traditionally been cumbersome. Historically, UANs were generated by employers, who submitted employee details to EPFO. However, issues such as incorrect or missing information, like the father’s name, mobile numbers, and birth dates, were common, often causing delays in accessing EPFO services or submitting claims. In many cases, employees never even received their UAN or had trouble with activation due to mismatched or missing contact details.

In response, EPFO has introduced a transformative solution that directly empowers employees to generate and activate their UAN through the UMANG Mobile App, using Aadhaar Face Authentication Technology (FAT). This new process resolves many of the previous challenges and streamlines UAN management, giving employees a fully digital, hassle-free experience.

Key Benefits Of The Aadhaar Face Authentication-Based UAN Process

The adoption of Aadhaar Face Authentication offers several advantages for employees:

  • 100% Aadhaar Validation: The UAN generation process ensures complete validation of employee details through biometric face recognition, guaranteeing that the information is accurate and securely linked to the individual’s Aadhaar profile.

  • Pre-Populated Employee Data: The system pulls all relevant employee data directly from the Aadhaar database, reducing the possibility of human error and eliminating the need for manual entry.

  • Instant UAN Activation: Once the UAN is generated through the process, it is automatically activated in the EPFO Member Portal. This immediate activation means employees can start using EPFO services right away.

  • No Employer Dependence: Employees no longer have to wait for employers to generate or activate their UAN. Instead, they can complete the process themselves and download their e-UAN card PDF directly from the app, cutting out unnecessary delays.

  • Unlocks EPFO Services: Upon successful activation, employees can immediately access a range of EPFO services, including passbook viewing, KYC updates, claim submissions, and more.

Step-by-Step Guide For Employees To Generate And Activate UAN

The process for employees to generate and activate their UAN using Aadhaar Face Authentication is straightforward. Follow these simple steps:

  1. Download the UMANG App: Start by downloading the UMANG App from the Play Store and installing it on your phone.
  2. Install AadhaarFaceRD App: Install the AadhaarFaceRD App, which is required for face authentication during the UAN generation process.
  3. Open the UMANG App: Launch the UMANG App and navigate to the “UAN Allotment and Activation” section under UAN services, choosing Face Auth.
  4. Enter Aadhaar and Mobile Details: Provide your Aadhaar number and the mobile number linked to your Aadhaar account. An OTP will be sent to this mobile number for validation.
  5. Complete Face Authentication: After verifying the OTP, the app will prompt you to take a live photo. Ensure the image is captured correctly—the green outline will indicate that the photo has been successfully taken.
  6. Receive UAN and Download e-UAN Card: Once the face authentication is successful, your UAN will be generated and sent to your mobile via SMS. You can then download your e-UAN card PDF from the UMANG App or the EPFO Member Portal. Your UAN will be auto-activated on the Member Portal, eliminating the need for additional steps.

Enhanced Security Through Biometric Authentication

One of the standout features of the new UAN generation and activation process is the incorporation of biometric authentication. Unlike traditional methods that rely on demographic information or OTP-based verification, Aadhaar Face Authentication ensures a higher level of security, making it nearly impossible for fraud or mistakes to slip through the cracks.

Biometric authentication, specifically through face recognition, offers a foolproof way of verifying an individual’s identity right from the point of entry into the EPFO system. This level of accuracy not only strengthens security but also provides an added layer of convenience for both employees and employers.

Why Face Authentication Is More Secure Than Traditional Methods

Traditional methods of verifying identity, such as demographic verification or OTP-based authentication, are prone to errors. For example, users might mistype their name or birthdate, or face delays in receiving OTPs, leading to frustration and unnecessary steps in the process.

With Face Authentication, the system directly matches the employee’s live photo against the Aadhaar database, ensuring that the right person is linked to the correct UAN. This method is much more secure because it uses unique biometric identifiers that cannot be replicated, ensuring that only the rightful individual can generate and activate their UAN. Additionally, the use of Aadhaar-linked mobile numbers adds another layer of verification, ensuring the data is consistent and tamper-proof.

Encouraging Employers To Adopt The New UAN Generation Process

While the new Aadhaar Face Authentication-based UAN generation system is designed to be employee-centric, employers also play a crucial role in ensuring its successful adoption. For many employees, particularly first-time jobholders, the process of generating and activating their UAN may seem unfamiliar or daunting. Here, employers can make a significant difference by encouraging and guiding their employees to use the new system.

Employers should consider promoting this direct method of UAN generation, helping employees understand the steps and benefits. By guiding employees through the process, employers can ensure that UANs are generated accurately and on time, eliminating the need for follow-up corrections. This proactive approach can significantly reduce the administrative burden on employers and speed up the onboarding process for new employees.

Additionally, employers should make it a point to educate their workforce about the advantages of self-service features that are now available through the EPFO Member Portal and the UMANG App. This can help employees take full advantage of EPFO services like passbook viewing, KYC updates, and claim submissions, streamlining their experience with EPFO.

EPFO’s Collaboration With My Bharat For Digital Life Certificates

In addition to the UAN generation process, EPFO is also expanding its digital services for pensioners. Through a collaboration with My Bharat, EPFO plans to promote the digital life certificate system known as Jeevan Pramaan, which will also leverage Face Authentication Technology.

This initiative aims to make life certificates available at the doorstep of pensioners, enabling them to authenticate their identity using biometric data, without the need for visiting EPFO offices. By extending the reach of digital services in this way, EPFO is ensuring that even pensioners who may face difficulties accessing physical offices can still benefit from timely and secure services.

The integration of Aadhaar Face Authentication into these services will provide an additional layer of security, ensuring that pensioners’ identities are verified accurately and promptly. This collaboration underscores EPFO’s commitment to improving accessibility and security for all members, regardless of their location or technical proficiency.

EPFO Simplifies Cash Withdrawals

Removal Of Cheque Leaf And Bank Passbook Upload Requirements

In this initiative aimed at reducing administrative bottlenecks, EPFO has also decided to completely remove the requirement for uploading images of cheque leaves or attested bank passbooks when filing online claims. For many EPF members, this step has been a source of delays and frustration due to the potential for poor-quality uploads, errors in document formatting, or even simple misunderstandings about what was required.

Historically, EPFO required these documents to verify the bank account details of members when they submitted claims. However, following the successful pilot of relaxing this requirement for KYC-updated members in May 2024, the policy has now been extended to all EPF members. This change is crucial as it eliminates one of the major reasons for claim rejections — poor-quality or unreadable uploads — thereby speeding up the process and reducing the volume of grievances related to documentation errors.

The UAN system, which links an employee’s bank account with their EPF account, already verifies the bank account holder’s name and account number at the time of account seeding. As a result, the need for additional documentation such as cheque leaf images or passbook attestation is now redundant.

By removing this additional step, EPFO aims to benefit an estimated 6 crore members, enabling faster, hassle-free claim settlements. With the elimination of this requirement, EPFO members will no longer face unnecessary delays in accessing their funds. This is particularly crucial for employees looking to withdraw or transfer their EPF balances in times of need, making the entire claims process more efficient and user-friendly.

Removal Of Employer Approval For Bank Account Seeding

EPFO has also introduced a key simplification to the process of seeding bank account details with the Universal Account Number (UAN), eliminating the need for employer approval after bank verification. This reform addresses one of the most time-consuming steps in the process of ensuring that an employee’s PF withdrawals are credited to their bank account.

Previously, after an employee submitted a request to seed their bank account with UAN, the employer was required to approve the verification, which added a layer of delay. On average, the bank verification took around 3 days, but the employer approval could take as long as 13 days, resulting in significant delays for members who were waiting for their PF balances to be credited to their accounts. This slow approval process created unnecessary backlogs and frustration for employees, especially for those who needed quick access to their funds.

To streamline this process, EPFO has now removed the employer approval step, making the seeding process faster and more efficient. This change will immediately benefit the 14.95 lakh members whose bank account verification requests were previously pending due to delays in employer approvals. With this reform, these members will now experience a much quicker resolution of their seeding requests.

In addition, the new system enables employees to update or change their bank account details linked to their UAN without needing employer intervention. The update process will be facilitated through Aadhaar OTP authentication, ensuring that the employee’s identity is securely verified. This makes the entire process more flexible, reducing dependency on employers and providing more control to the members over their account details.

EPFO Expands Partnerships With Banks

In another key development, EPFO has expanded its network of empanelled banks to 32, including 15 new public and private sector banks. This move enhances transaction efficiency, ensuring quicker and more seamless processing of EPF contributions and claims.

Previously, employers were limited to a smaller pool of banks when remitting EPF contributions. With the inclusion of these 15 additional banks, EPFO is now providing employers with a wider range of options to choose from, improving flexibility and reducing administrative friction. The total annual collections managed through these banks amount to nearly Rs. 12,000 crore, allowing for smoother and more direct contributions to EPF accounts.

Employees will no longer face delays in the bank account verification process when they seed their accounts with UAN, as these newly empanelled banks will now directly verify the bank details of employees. This ensures that members can access their EPF balances more quickly, without relying on third-party aggregators, which previously added delays to the process.

This reform will also reduce the time taken for EPF dues to be processed, allowing for quicker investment and increasing the potential returns on members’ savings. Previously, dues remitted through non-empanelled banks often took T+2 days for processing, whereas transactions with empanelled banks are now processed on a T+1 day basis. This improvement not only speeds up the process but also benefits EPFO by lowering operational costs related to name validation and reducing dependency on intermediary channels.

For employers, the expanded network provides greater convenience when dealing with EPF payments. The ability to interact directly with a broader set of banks to resolve payment issues or grievances will lead to a more efficient and transparent process.

Digital Threat Report 2024

Digital Threat Report 2024 For The BFSI Sector: Key Highlights

Introduction To The Digital Threat Report 2024

The financial sector in India is changing fast. With digital payments, embedded finance, and cloud-based systems becoming the norm, banks and financial institutions are moving quickly to adopt new technologies. But that progress comes with risk.

The Digital Threat Report 2024, produced jointly by the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), Cyber Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRT-Fin), and SISA, clearly outlines the scale of those risks. It offers a detailed look at how cybercriminals are adapting their tactics, the vulnerabilities most commonly exploited, and where organisations continue to fall short, often despite significant investment in cybersecurity.

The Digital Threat Report 2024 was launched by Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, Shri M Nagaraju and Secretary, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Shri S Krishnan, along with the Director General, Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), Dr Sanjay Bahl and the Founder and CEO, SISA, Dharshan Shanthamurthy.

This first-of-its-kind report arrives with some striking numbers. The average cost of a data breach globally in 2024 has hit $4.88 million, with the figure in India at $2.18 million, up 10% from last year. In just the first six months of the year, phishing attacks in India alone rose by 175%.

The report also makes clear that the most serious risks no longer come from brute-force attacks. Instead, cybercriminals are finding their way into supply chains, cloud misconfigurations, weak API security, and, in some cases, deepfake-based impersonations of senior staff. Identity theft and session hijacking have become more precise and convincing.

Understanding The Urgency For Cybersecurity In The BFSI Sector

Cyber threats in the BFSI sector are no longer theoretical or edge-case scenarios. They are real, frequent, and often quietly destructive. The Digital Threat Report 2024 opens with a stark reminder—this is not a future problem. It’s already happening.

Banks, insurers, payment platforms, and fintech companies are under continuous pressure to deliver seamless digital experiences. That shift has brought significant operational gains, but it has also widened the attack surface dramatically. Every API call, every third-party plugin, every cloud-hosted data lake has become a potential point of entry.

Crucially, these incidents are not the result of wildly sophisticated zero-day exploits. In many cases, they stem from basic, preventable lapses. Misconfigured cloud storage, hardcoded credentials, poor session management, and lax controls around dormant accounts continue to give attackers an easy way in. The use of MFA, often seen as a silver bullet, is being actively circumvented through session hijacking, deepfake-enabled impersonation, and brute-force attacks on push notifications.

The sector’s complexity adds another layer of risk. A payment gateway depends on a network of vendors, infrastructure partners, and service APIs. A breach at any point in that chain can ripple outwards. The Digital Threat Report illustrates this with case studies where supply chain compromises and insider manipulation went undetected for months, in some instances resulting in reputational damage and silent financial loss.

There’s also the issue of visibility. Many institutions are running dozens of cybersecurity tools, yet still struggle to see what’s happening in real time. According to the report, the average organisation globally now uses between 64 and 76 security products, but breaches remain common. Tools, without coordination and clarity, aren’t enough.

Perhaps the most telling insight in the report is this: some of the hardest-hit institutions were considered mature from a compliance standpoint. They had policies, frameworks, even certifications—but they lacked operational readiness. Threats moved faster than internal processes could respond.

In short, the problem is not a lack of effort—it’s a misalignment of effort. Security has often been treated as a technical function when in fact it cuts across governance, culture, technology, and accountability. What the Digital Threat Report calls for is not just better tools, but a sharper focus. Awareness that cyber resilience isn’t about blocking every attack. It’s about ensuring that when something does go wrong—and it will—the organisation can detect it quickly, contain it effectively, and recover without losing trust.

Key Takeaways From The Threat Scenario

1. Breaches Are Becoming More Expensive, And More Routine

The average cost of a data breach globally in 2024 is now estimated at $4.88 million, while in India, it stands at $2.18 million—a 10% increase over the previous year. These figures reflect not only rising attacker sophistication but also systemic delays in detection, response, and recovery.

The report notes that while many institutions have invested in advanced tooling, a lack of integration, coordination, and clarity in response planning continues to compound post-breach damage.

2. Phishing, BEC, And Identity Theft Have Grown Sharper And More Scalable

  • India experienced a 175% surge in phishing attacks in H1 2024 compared to the same period last year.
  • Phishing remains the initial infection vector in 25% of recorded incidents in the BFSI sector.
  • 54% of BEC (Business Email Compromise) cases investigated involved pretexting, a technique where attackers construct plausible backstories to deceive employees.
  • Generative AI is enabling attackers to craft grammatically flawless phishing emails, removing traditional red flags.
  • Deepfake-enhanced impersonations have enabled executive-level fraud, bypassing manual verification protocols.

The report cites the growing availability of “deepfake-as-a-service” platforms and malicious LLMs such as WormGPT and FraudGPT, which are being used to automate social engineering, write malware, and impersonate decision-makers with startling realism.

3. Credential Theft Remains A Central Strategy

  • Attackers are acquiring credentials through a combination of phishing, information-stealing malware, and dark web purchases.
  • Once acquired, credentials are being used to compromise SSO platforms, VPNs, SaaS applications, and email systems.
  • Many attacks bypass multi-factor authentication through session hijacking or exploiting broken object-level authorisation (BOLA) flaws in APIs.

One critical observation from the report: SaaS platforms often include sensitive customer information in URLs, which, when paired with stolen session tokens, can lead to broad data exposure with minimal effort.

4. Cloud Infrastructure Is Misconfigured And Actively Targeted

Cloud misconfigurations are listed as a recurring point of failure:

  • Exposed storage buckets, default passwords, and poor IAM (Identity and Access Management) policies are frequently observed.
  • Threat actors are exploiting cloud tokens exposed in web source code, targeting AWS, Azure, and GCP environments.
  • The average time to exploit a known cloud vulnerability post-disclosure is less than eight days, in some cases just hours.

The report features multiple cases, including one where a fintech’s XSS vulnerability in a rich text editor allowed the injection of webshells, ultimately giving attackers access to cloud-stored client data via Amazon S3 buckets.

5. API Weaknesses Are Enabling Payment Fraud

The BFSI sector’s rapid API adoption has created efficiency, but also exposure.

  • Hardcoded API keys, reused credentials across environments, and predictable authorisation patterns are key issues.
  • One documented case saw attackers conduct a replay attack, where they successfully mimicked legitimate bank transfer requests through APIs, executing unauthorised payments while leaving wallet balances untouched.
  • Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) misconfigurations were also cited as enabling unauthorised access from untrusted domains.

6. Supply Chain Attacks Are Multiplying

The MOVEit and GoAnywhere breaches are referenced in the report to illustrate the rising threat posed by third-party software providers:

  • CL0P ransomware group targeted these platforms, impacting thousands of organisations globally.
  • Open-source libraries like XZ Utils were compromised, with attackers introducing a backdoor affecting multiple Linux distributions.
  • Malicious libraries were uploaded to repositories such as PyPI and GitHub, disguised as legitimate tools to gain developer trust.

These attacks allowed adversaries to introduce vulnerabilities into production systems during routine updates, without direct access to the target institution.

7. Vulnerability Exploitation Has Become Time-Critical

  • The average time from vulnerability disclosure to exploitation has dropped to under 8 days, with some exploits observed within a few hours of public release.
  • The report notes a 180% increase in incidents involving known vulnerabilities, particularly those affecting internet-facing applications and services.

8. Attacks Are Now Systemic, Interlinked, And Often Undetected

Modern cyberattacks no longer rely on a single point of failure. They are orchestrated across:

  • Cloud misconfigurations (e.g., S3 exposure),
  • Insider manipulation (e.g., of dormant accounts and card systems),
  • APIs with BOLA flaws, and
  • Phishing via AI-generated content.

Each vector reinforces the next. In several cases, the attackers moved laterally from one subsystem to another, remaining undetected for extended periods, at times over two years, as in the insider threat case cited in the report.

The Rise Of Social Engineering And Credential Theft

Social engineering, once the domain of crude phishing emails and low-effort impersonations, has become one of the most sophisticated and effective cyberattack strategies used against the BFSI sector. According to the report, its impact is now amplified by automation, AI-generated content, and deepfake technologies, turning what was once a manual con into a scalable, almost industrialised method of breach.

Social Engineering Is Now Personalised And Scalable

The report identifies Business Email Compromise (BEC) and phishing as the most persistent forms of social engineering in financial services:

  • 54% of BEC incidents analysed involved some form of pretexting—that is, attackers creating plausible narratives to coax employees into taking action.
  • These attacks are often backed by data scraped from social media, public records, or even prior breaches, allowing adversaries to mimic tone, internal language, and relationship dynamics.

The role of AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) is critical here. Attackers are now generating context-aware phishing messages that are grammatically correct, free of typographical cues, and virtually indistinguishable from legitimate internal communication.

Moreover, AI-generated phishing is no longer limited to email. The report cites a worrying rise in the use of NLP-driven chatbots deployed via SMS, social media, and browser-based applications. These chatbots simulate real customer service agents and extract information in real time, without the need for malware or code injection.

Deepfakes Have Moved From Novelty To Threat

The convergence of social engineering with deepfake technology represents a substantial risk for the BFSI sector. The report details cases in which:

  • Synthetic audio and video were used to impersonate executives, authorise fund transfers, or approve system access.
  • “Deepfake-as-a-service” platforms made such attacks more accessible, reducing the technical barrier for cybercriminals.
  • MFA protections were bypassed not through code, but by convincing a human to approve a fraudulent request, based on a realistic video or voice prompt.

Credential Theft: Still Central, But Smarter

Credential theft continues to be a key enabler of more complex attacks. The report outlines three primary sources:

  1. Phishing, enhanced by AI and social engineering
  2. Information-stealing malware, often distributed via seemingly benign documents
  3. Dark web marketplaces, where stolen credentials are sold or traded

Once obtained, these credentials are used to access:

  • Single Sign-On (SSO) platforms
  • VPNs
  • Email accounts
  • SaaS applications
  • Internal admin dashboards

A recurring issue flagged in the report is the lack of session control and token invalidation. Many systems allow sessions to persist even after logout or inactivity, making them vulnerable to token theft and reuse.

The report also details how SaaS applications often include customer-specific information in URLs, which, when paired with valid session cookies, gives attackers unfettered access to highly sensitive data, without triggering any alerts.

Multi-Factor Authentication Is Being Circumvented

While MFA adoption has grown, attackers have adapted accordingly. Common techniques now include:

  • Session hijacking: Stealing cookies or tokens to bypass the need for real-time authentication
  • Push notification fatigue: Bombarding users with repeated MFA prompts until they approve one out of frustration
  • Deepfake impersonation: Tricking users into handing over OTPs or approvals based on fake authority figures
  • Broken Object-Level Authorisation (BOLA): Exploiting flaws in how APIs validate user roles, often enabling bypasses of OTP flows entirely

In one documented case, attackers used BOLA to access an OTP-protected endpoint on a payments platform, rendering the OTP process effectively meaningless.

Tactics Are Evolving Faster Than Controls

The report makes it clear: defensive strategies based on known tactics are no longer sufficient. The line between technical breach and psychological manipulation is now blurred. Attacks increasingly combine:

  • Technical vulnerabilities (e.g., cloud misconfigurations),
  • Behavioural exploitation (e.g., urgency emails from fake CEOs), and
  • Credential reuse or session replay techniques

The implication for financial institutions is twofold: first, they must monitor who is accessing systems just as closely as what is being accessed. Second, they must anticipate that some attacks will look entirely legitimate at the surface level.

AI As An Enabler And Exploiter

Artificial Intelligence has become a tool of contradiction in cybersecurity—empowering defenders while simultaneously equipping attackers with speed, precision, and scale previously out of reach. What emerges in the Digital Threat Report 2024 is not just concern about AI’s misuse, but clear evidence of how it’s already being exploited in live incidents—some targeting high-trust systems within India’s BFSI sector.

For banks, insurers, fintechs and their customers, this dual use of AI means two things: the line between genuine and malicious interaction is fading, and the time window to detect deception is narrowing.

AI Is Being Used To Bypass Traditional Security Layers—Not Just Humans

While much attention has been paid to AI-generated phishing emails, the report highlights a more technical and immediate threat: AI-generated code that exploits cloud, API, and application vulnerabilities in real-time.

  • The rise of LLM-assisted vulnerability discovery has allowed attackers to scan large codebases and uncover exploitable endpoints faster than ever before.
  • Tools such as FraudGPT and WormGPT are now trained specifically on software documentation and vulnerability databases like CVE and OWASP, helping attackers generate tailor-made payloads against exposed infrastructure.
  • These models are even capable of modifying exploit scripts on the fly based on target environment responses, replicating what once took hours of manual testing.

For customers, this means that attacks now require less reconnaissance and less trial-and-error. A small oversight—an outdated web application firewall, or a misconfigured API—can now be exploited at scale using a few lines of automated LLM-generated logic.

Threat Actors Are Training AI On Organisational Structures

One of the more subtle, but significant developments outlined in the report is that attackers are increasingly feeding AI systems with organisational metadata to model trust relationships and simulate internal authority.

  • Public data from LinkedIn, Glassdoor, company websites, and press releases is being used to construct synthetic internal maps of organisations.
  • These are then used to inform phishing campaigns, fake escalations, or impersonation attempts that mirror actual chains of command.
  • In one reported incident, attackers impersonated an AVP in a lending institution using accurate job history and internal jargon gathered from social data and insider leaks. The deception wasn’t flagged for three days.

Model Poisoning And AI-Driven Surveillance Are Underestimated Risks

The report flags the emerging threat of AI model poisoning, particularly in BFSI environments where machine learning is increasingly used to detect fraud or assess creditworthiness.

  • Adversaries are actively testing the limits of feedback loops in ML systems—injecting false behavioural signals to train fraud detection models into underestimating real risk.
  • In open feedback environments (e.g., customer sentiment models, behavioural risk engines), a well-orchestrated campaign could allow malicious inputs to bias the model toward false negatives.
  • The report draws attention to this in the context of AI-based onboarding systems and alternative credit scoring platforms, where model trust is silently eroded over time.

For customers, this means decisions about loan approval, account flags, or fraud alerts could be quietly manipulated, without either side being immediately aware.

Synthetic Identity Generation Is Being Used To Open Fraudulent Accounts

The report draws attention to a growing phenomenon: synthetic identity fraud powered by AI tools that assemble highly plausible—but entirely fictitious—digital identities.

  • These identities are built using publicly available datasets (e.g. Aadhaar data leaks, voter records, dark web dumps) and filled out with fabricated personal histories, fake biometric data, and AI-generated photographs.
  • Using these, attackers are able to pass eKYC checks, generate credit activity, and even obtain legitimate documents from secondary authorities before disappearing entirely.
  • These accounts are then used for laundering money, accessing promotional credit products, or acting as mule accounts in broader fraud schemes.

Customers are often unaware that their compromised details are being used as “fragments” in synthetic identity creation, especially in rural or semi-urban segments where digital trail verification is less stringent.

AI Is Accelerating Financial Infrastructure Mapping For Targeted Breaches

Finally, the report documents how attackers are deploying AI to build real-time maps of institutional digital infrastructure—essentially creating a virtual blueprint of how a bank or insurer’s tech stack is laid out.

  • By scanning headers, DNS data, TLS certificates, public code repositories, and employee tech blogs, threat actors can build detailed models of what software is deployed where, and what its likely vulnerabilities are.
  • These AI-driven scans are run continuously, with results compared over time to detect changes in infrastructure posture, opening the door for just-in-time attacks after patch rollbacks, migrations, or product launches.

This kind of digital surveillance, automated and persistent, means that even minor updates can attract immediate attacker attention, especially in institutions that fail to update WAF rules or reconfigure access controls after change deployments.

Takeaway For Institutions And Customers Alike

AI is no longer a theoretical disruptor in cybersecurity. It is already being weaponised across the attack lifecycle: discovery, deception, exploitation, persistence, and evasion.

For institutions, this means re-evaluating what “real-time defence” actually looks like. For customers, it means being aware that not all fraud starts with negligence—some now begin with a perfect replica of your digital footprint, constructed by systems designed to deceive.

Supply Chain Attacks And Third-Party Risks

For years, cybersecurity strategies in BFSI have focused on perimeter control—keeping external threats at bay. But as financial institutions adopt cloud-native tools, outsourced operations, embedded finance APIs, and open banking frameworks, the perimeter has shifted. It now extends across a vast, interconnected network of vendors, processors, code libraries, and software dependencies.

According to the report, this extended chain of trust has become one of the most actively exploited attack vectors—not because of its visibility, but precisely because of its invisibility.

Trusted Software Is Now A Vector For Silent Breach

The report flags multiple high-profile examples of compromised third-party tools resulting in widespread exposure:

  • The MOVEit Transfer breach, orchestrated by the CL0P ransomware group, affected several Indian BFSI entities indirectly via vendors that relied on the vulnerable file transfer utility.
  • Similarly, GoAnywhere MFT, another widely deployed managed file transfer solution, was exploited in early 2024 to steal sensitive records from downstream BFSI service providers.
  • In both cases, the exploit chain did not originate inside the financial institutions themselves. Instead, it passed through trusted service providers handling data movement or regulatory reporting.

Open Source Is Ubiquitous, But Rarely Audited

The report issues a pointed warning about open-source software in financial applications:

  • Code libraries like XZ Utils, compromised in early 2024 via a backdoor planted in a widely used Linux compression package, serve as a reminder that even core infrastructure is not immune to manipulation.
  • Developers working within BFSI projects often pull libraries from public repositories (e.g., GitHub, PyPI) without verifying integrity or digital signatures.
  • The XZ attack was particularly dangerous because the backdoor was introduced by a trusted contributor over the course of multiple commits across two years, highlighting the patience and planning behind supply chain operations.

This creates a dual risk: institutions unknowingly deploy tainted code into production systems, and attackers exploit that code only after it’s deeply embedded in the transaction pipeline.

API Aggregators And Embedded Finance Platforms Are Emerging Risks

India’s fintech ecosystem is increasingly reliant on API aggregators, account aggregators, and KYC processors—many of which have direct access to user data, payment tokens, or transaction approval mechanisms.

The report identifies risks stemming from:

  • Poorly secured API gateways, where misconfigured authentication policies allow unauthorised access to sensitive data or functionality.
  • Inconsistent patching policies across vendors are leaving outdated components in production environments.
  • Insufficient audit trails make it difficult to attribute unusual behaviour to a specific vendor action.

In one case study, a third-party identity verification platform, integrated via API with a digital NBFC, was exploited using a token replay technique that allowed attackers to submit stale authentication tokens and complete KYC checks under false identities.

Vendor Risk Management Is Often Superficial

While most BFSI organisations have vendor onboarding and audit frameworks, the report points to gaps in enforcement, frequency, and scope:

  • Security questionnaires are often generic and self-attested, with little verification.
  • Annual audits are insufficient in fast-evolving attack environments, especially when codebases and access controls change weekly.
  • Many firms lack visibility into fourth-party dependencies—vendors of vendors—who may hold system-level access or process sensitive customer information.

The challenge, as the report outlines, is not merely identifying risk, but quantifying it and aligning it to real business impact.

Consequences For Customers: Silent Exposure

From a customer’s standpoint, these breaches are largely invisible until it’s too late. Sensitive data may be accessed, accounts manipulated, or transactions interfered with, without any breach occurring within the customer’s bank itself.

This decoupling of compromise from immediate visibility makes response slower and trust erosion harder to contain. Moreover, customers have no visibility into which third-party tools their financial service provider uses, or how rigorously they’re monitored.

Recommendations Emphasised In The Report

The Digital Threat Report offers a few key directives for BFSI firms:

  • Implement Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for all production dependencies
  • Establish continuous vendor monitoring, not just point-in-time audits
  • Require code integrity checks and digital signing for third-party libraries
  • Ensure zero-trust policies extend to vendors and API partners
  • Classify third-party services based on data access and enforce differentiated risk controls

Sectoral Defence – Observations Across Layers

Through a series of simulated attacks, incident response reviews, and forensic audits, the report reveals how security controls are implemented in reality, not how they are written in policy.

Application Security

Despite sector-wide adoption of microservices and API-first architecture, application-layer security remains patchy. The report highlights that authorisation logic is often enforced at the user interface level but inconsistently applied at the API layer, creating exploitable gaps in back-end enforcement. Several banking and lending applications exposed sensitive data such as PAN numbers, contact information, or KYC metadata through unsecured endpoints.

In many instances, encryption was either absent or poorly implemented. Sensitive user inputs—particularly those related to verification steps—were not consistently masked in transit. The most common oversight was the exposure of internal API keys or session tokens in front-end code, which allowed attackers to replay requests or modify session variables during testing.

Identity And Access Control

Control over digital identities, especially internal roles and service accounts, continues to be a weak link. The report finds repeated use of over-permissioned roles, including admin-level access granted to test accounts and expired vendors. In several simulated intrusions, red teams were able to gain persistent access via dormant accounts that had not been deactivated after a contractor’s exit.

Session management policies, while defined in internal documentation, were rarely enforced rigorously. Attackers exploited long-lived tokens, reused credentials between UAT and production environments, and, in some cases, leveraged a lack of session invalidation after logout to persist across application layers. Multi-factor authentication, though present on public-facing platforms, was notably absent from internal admin portals and dashboards, exposing a major surface of attack.

Cloud And DevSecOps Exposure

The report is especially critical of cloud deployment hygiene. While most BFSI firms had moved to hybrid or multi-cloud infrastructure, many had failed to configure storage and compute permissions correctly. Common findings included publicly accessible S3 buckets, unencrypted backups, and secrets hardcoded into deployment scripts.

DevOps practices often lag behind the security expectations placed on live infrastructure. CI/CD pipelines, which should act as security gatekeepers, were often configured without runtime testing for vulnerabilities. More concerningly, most institutions had no automated enforcement of security policy at the code commit level, leaving misconfigured infrastructure-as-code (IaC) files to propagate into production.

Network Segmentation And Monitoring

In terms of network architecture, the report notes a reliance on traditional perimeter security without adequate internal segmentation. In the event of a breach, attackers were often able to move laterally across environments with minimal resistance. Logs, where available, were typically fragmented between identity systems, cloud platforms, and network firewalls, making effective correlation and detection difficult.

More worryingly, in many real-world breach investigations, alerts were raised by SIEM or IDS systems but not acted upon, largely due to alert fatigue, unclear ownership, or lack of training among operational teams.

Governance And Operational Response

Perhaps the most concerning set of findings relates to governance. Incident response playbooks, where they existed, were often out of date, static, and not tailored to digital operations. Roles and escalation paths were unclear, and in several engagements, it was found that security operations centres (SOCs) escalated alerts to business teams with no defined protocol on how to respond.

Furthermore, third-party systems were frequently onboarded without structured risk reviews or technical integration audits. KYC vendors, payment aggregators, or CRM providers were often trusted by default, even when embedded deep within transaction workflows. The absence of real-time risk scoring or behavioural monitoring meant that suspicious activity through third-party integrations went unnoticed.

Regulatory Directions And Gaps

In recent years, India’s regulatory landscape has undergone a profound shift. Where compliance was once treated as a periodic obligation—an annual exercise in box-ticking—it has now evolved into a core operational function within financial services. The Digital Threat Report 2024 recognises this transformation, but also highlights the growing complexity that institutions must navigate as regulators, jurisdictions, and international frameworks overlap in unpredictable ways.

A Dense Thicket Of Regulatory Mandates

The regulatory ecosystem in India is described in the report as “rapidly evolving”—a polite way of saying labyrinthine. Financial entities today must adhere to a range of directives, including:

  • CERT-In’s six-hour breach reporting mandate, which compels institutions to disclose incidents swiftly, sometimes before investigations have even stabilised.
  • RBI’s Master Directions on Digital Payment Security Controls (DPSC) and Outsourcing of IT Services, placing stringent controls on authentication, data encryption, and vendor oversight.
  • The Cyber Security Framework (CSF) for banks establishes baseline security standards but requires individual interpretation.
  • SEBI’s Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework (CSCRF), targeted at stock exchanges and depositories.
  • IRDAI’s Information and Cybersecurity Guidelines, built specifically for insurers.
  • The Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023, adds statutory backing to consent, storage limitation, and purpose limitation principles.
  • PCI DSS 4.0, GDPR, and CCPA for globally operating BFSI firms.

Each framework represents a good-faith effort to modernise cybersecurity in its domain. But taken together, they form a fractured compliance mosaic, particularly burdensome for fintechs and conglomerates operating across sectors and geographies.

Compliance Fatigue: The Cost Of Fragmentation

Institutions face regulatory duplication, contradictory obligations, and significant operational drag in managing audits, controls, and documentation. The lack of a unified cybersecurity framework leads to redundant risk assessments, overlapping breach reports, and inconsistent technical standards across lines of business.

In cross-border payment systems, where transaction speed and precision are non-negotiable, these inefficiencies have real implications. The inconsistencies slow down decision-making, complicate threat response, and increase the cost of staying compliant without necessarily reducing risk.

Compliance-As-Innovation

What’s more encouraging, however, is the emergence of a design-forward approach to compliance. The report spotlights financial organisations that are embedding compliance protocols at the product development stage, rather than retrofitting them after launch.

This includes the use of:

  • Data anonymisation and synthetic datasets to train fraud models without compromising real customer data.
  • Privacy-by-design principles, where customer consent, data minimisation, and access restrictions are built into application architecture.
  • Security-by-default configurations—especially for API endpoints, transaction logging, and cloud storage platforms.

Such moves are not only cost-effective but also position these institutions for faster scaling, fewer audit frictions, and improved stakeholder trust.

The Push For Harmonisation

Despite the regulatory sprawl, the report observes growing consensus across regulators to pursue harmonised standards. RBI, SEBI, and IRDAI are increasingly aligned in their understanding of sectoral risks, and organisations such as CERT-In and CSIRT-Fin are now acting as connective tissue, providing not just guidance but strategic coordination across response frameworks, threat intelligence dissemination, and testing protocols.

The momentum is clearly towards cohesive regulation, not just to reduce compliance fatigue, but to foster a uniform standard of resilience across India’s BFSI ecosystem.

Regulatory Gaps That Demand Urgent Attention

Yet, the report does not gloss over where gaps remain. These include:

  • Lack of universal standards across digital payment systems—wallets, UPI, QR codes, and embedded finance products still operate under inconsistent security norms.
  • Absence of formal response mandates like red-teaming or breach simulations, which are vital in testing real-world resilience.
  • No regulatory guidance on AI-generated threats, such as impersonation fraud via deepfakes or LLM-manipulated phishing tools.
  • Underpowered cyber leadership, with CISOs often lacking the organisational clout to enforce security policy independently from CIOs or CTOs.
  • No roadmap yet for post-quantum cryptography, despite warnings that public key infrastructure may not withstand future computational models.

These aren’t merely procedural shortcomings. They represent strategic vulnerabilities in an environment where adversaries are increasingly faster and better funded than their targets.

Actionable Recommendations

The report outlines six concrete suggestions to bridge these gaps:

  1. Treat cybersecurity as a techno-commercial function—not an IT silo—with direct reporting to CEOs or Chief Risk Officers.
  2. Standardise digital payment security across form factors, ensuring that UPI, wallets, and cards are treated with parity.
  3. Accelerate preparation for quantum threats, including migration strategies and testing protocols.
  4. Incentivise certification programmes to create a skilled pool of payment security specialists.
  5. Mandate regular incident simulations to uncover hidden failure points before attackers do.
  6. Draft a Responsible AI framework for BFSI, focusing not only on fairness and accuracy but misuse and weaponisation risks​.

Cybersecurity In 2025: What Lies Ahead?

While the core threats are called out explicitly in the report, the full breadth of its findings—spanning observed breach patterns, adversary tactics, and forensic insights—adds texture and urgency to this outlook.

1. Deepfake Identity Fraud Will Scale Executive Impersonation

Voice cloning, synthetic avatars, and video forgeries are no longer fringe experiments. The report cites widespread adoption of deepfake technology for corporate impersonation, where attackers use hyperrealistic voice or video to impersonate a CFO or CEO in real-time, often during virtual calls or messaging threads. OTP phishing, fund diversion, and executive-level BEC scams are the most common payloads​.

  1. Supply Chain Attacks Will Target The Software Backbone

Third-party integrations are a silent risk. The report illustrates how malicious libraries—often disguised as legitimate open-source components—can slip into core banking systems, digital apps, or APIs. These are particularly hard to detect because they arrive via trusted vendors or routine updates. Notably, cases like the MOVEit and GoAnywhere breaches are referenced to highlight the risks of managed file transfer services​.

3. IoT Devices Will Become Prime Infiltration Points

Financial systems are increasingly dependent on kiosks, smart safes, biometric devices, and surveillance hardware. Many of these are underpatched, poorly segmented, or operate on outdated firmware. Once breached, they become pivot points into sensitive systems or customer data environments​.

4. Prompt Injection And Local LLM Exploits Will Rise Sharply

With financial institutions exploring AI-native interfaces—from chatbots to document reviewers—the risk of prompt injection attacks is growing. Locally hosted LLMs (as opposed to cloud-based models) are particularly vulnerable to input manipulation that causes data leaks, policy bypass, or dangerous automated outputs​.

5. Adversarial LLMs Will Democratise Sophisticated Cyber Offence

WormGPT, FraudGPT, WolfGPT—these maliciously trained LLMs are enabling a new class of attackers to generate polymorphic malware, phishing templates, exploit kits, and social engineering scripts at scale. Crucially, these tools can mutate to evade detection and are already being sold on dark web forums​.

6. Cryptocurrencies Will Remain Both Target And Tool

The report details how attackers are shifting focus from exchanges to crypto wallets, smart contracts, and custodial platforms. These assets offer anonymity, immutability, and fast monetisation, making them ideal for laundering and extortion, particularly in ransomware or data-theft scenarios​.

7. Quantum Computing Could Break Today’s Encryption

Although quantum threats are still theoretical in 2024, the report flags them as urgent for financial systems reliant on RSA or ECC encryption. The lack of a national migration plan for post-quantum cryptography puts high-value data, like account credentials or transaction logs, at long-term risk​.

8. Zero-Day Exploits And Patch Lag Will Widen Risk Windows

A key statistic: the average time to exploit a disclosed vulnerability is now eight days. Many BFSI entities still operate without continuous scanning, automated patching, or VAPT cycles frequent enough to match the pace of exposure. Zero-day exploits remain a preferred point of entry​.

9. API Abuse Will Bypass Perimeter Controls

From mobile wallets to third-party payment apps, weak API authentication—hardcoded keys, predictable naming schemes, credential reuse—remains one of the most abused vulnerabilities. These weaknesses are especially dangerous because they are public-facing and linked directly to money movement​.

10. Cloud Misconfigurations Will Continue To Leak Sensitive Data

Cloud buckets left open, IAM roles overly permissive, or critical logs not ingested by SIEMs—these are not hypothetical flaws. The report outlines repeated examples of data breaches due to poor cloud hygiene. The rapid pace of cloud adoption is outstripping the pace of secure configuration in most firms​.

11. Business Email Compromise (BEC) Will Become AI-Powered

AI models can now write perfect emails in multiple languages and spoof tone and formatting. This makes phishing more convincing and harder to detect. The report notes that in over 54% of BEC cases, attackers used pretexting with stolen session data, OTP interception, or AI-generated content​.

12. Multifactor Authentication Will Not Be Enough

MFA, once considered the gold standard, is now regularly bypassed. Methods include session hijacking, push fatigue attacks, deepfake OTP theft, and vulnerabilities like BOLA (Broken Object Level Authentication). Many financial institutions are only now revisiting their MFA implementations in light of these methods​.

13. Ransomware Will Shift To Data Extortion Models

Rather than encrypting data and demanding decryption keys, newer ransomware groups are focusing on exfiltration and extortion, threatening to leak sensitive financial data unless payment is made. This tactic has proven more lucrative and harder to neutralise with backups alone​.

14. Social Engineering Will Converge With Insider Threats

The report also references external actors compromising employees via social engineering, bribery, or deception. In some incidents (including outside India), administrators were persuaded via cryptocurrency incentives to alter settings or disable controls. This marks a concerning convergence of human error and intentional sabotage​.

From Vulnerable To Vigilant: Building Cyber Resilience That Lasts

If the Digital Threat Report 2024 delivers one message with clarity, it’s this: today’s threats will not be stopped by yesterday’s defences. And yet, most financial institutions still rely on security measures built for an earlier time, when threats were linear, insider-driven, and human-scaled.

The new cyber landscape is asymmetrical, faster than before, and often machine-led. Resilience, then, is no longer about plugging holes. It’s about building systems—across people, processes, and infrastructure—that can withstand pressure without collapse.

Investing In People Who Understand The Stakes

Cybersecurity training still exists in most institutions—but it’s often too rare, too broad, and too dull. The report makes a sharp point: staff don’t need longer e-learning videos. They need short, frequent, role-specific training that reflects the threats they are most likely to face.

In today’s environment, that includes recognising deepfakes, spotting QR-code traps, and understanding how AI can spoof tone, identity, and legitimacy. This is especially important for executives and finance teams, who remain prime targets for BEC (Business Email Compromise) and authorisation fraud.

Just as critically, the report calls out the governance gap. It’s not enough to have a CISO buried under the CIO. Cybersecurity must report into risk leadership or directly to the CEO, not because of hierarchy, but because that’s where real decisions get made.

What to do:

  • Drop the once-a-year training model. Move to quarterly, threat-specific refreshers.
  • Equip executives with deepfake and AI-scam awareness, especially around authorisation flows.
  • Ensure cyber risk leadership sits at board level, not just IT or infrastructure.

Fixing The Framework

Good security frameworks often look solid on slides. But the moment a breach occurs, clarity disappears. Who responds first? Who decides if law enforcement is involved? What happens if customer data is affected? And how soon does reporting need to happen?

According to the report, most institutions still don’t run simulation drills to answer these questions under stress. And in several major incidents reviewed, the response plan wasn’t followed, because no one had rehearsed it.

It’s not just response plans that need work. Vulnerability management remains too slow. Patching cycles are still monthly, when most critical exploits go live in under eight days. In the age of adversarial AI, even a fortnight’s delay can be fatal.

What to do:

  • Run regular breach simulation exercises, not just tabletop exercises.
  • Shorten patching cycles. For high-severity CVEs, aim for under a week, not a month.
  • Align cyber process ownership across functions—not just IT, but fraud, compliance, and legal.

Smarter Technology: Tools That Predict, Not Just Detect

The report doesn’t push for more technology. It argues for smarter, integrated technology tools that work together, flag anomalies in context, and allow for automation when response time is everything.

In particular, it points to AI-based monitoring systems capable of identifying behavioural deviations in real time, autonomous patching, and identity-based access controls that remove blanket permissions and reduce lateral movement.

It also warns against blind spots in mobile-first and cloud-first environments. Many firms still fail to monitor API traffic, still leave cloud storage buckets exposed, and still treat service-to-service traffic as trusted. That trust, the report says, is being weaponised.

What to do:

  • Adopt Zero Trust Architecture, not just in theory but in traffic flows.
  • Monitor API and service-layer logs, not just endpoint devices.
  • Transition to adaptive access control—permissions that expire or adjust with behaviour, not just login state.
  • Bake security into DevOps pipelines. Automated checks at code commit and deployment can catch what manual review misses.

Conclusion

The Digital Threat Report 2024 leaves little room for complacency. From AI-driven fraud to deepfake impersonation, from supply chain intrusions to regulatory fragmentation, the risks are escalating in both speed and sophistication. But the message isn’t fatalistic—it’s instructive. Institutions that treat cybersecurity as an operational benchmark, not a compliance obligation, will be best positioned to withstand what’s coming. Resilience isn’t just a matter of controls; it’s a mindset, rooted in clarity, accountability, and constant rehearsal.

Loan-Origination-Software-Services-blog-image

Enhancing Loan Origination Software Services

Introduction

As the financial industry becomes increasingly competitive, lenders are looking for ways to accelerate loan processing while maintaining accuracy and compliance. Loan Origination Software (LOS) serves as a key technology in this pursuit, facilitating the streamlined handling of loan applications from inception to decision. This article delves into how integrating AuthBridge’s sophisticated services with LOS can transform the lending environment, offering lenders a more robust, secure, and efficient means of processing loan applications. 

What Is A Loan Origination Software (LOS)?

Loan Origination Software (LOS) is a technology employed by banks, credit unions, and other lending institutions to facilitate and manage the loan application process more efficiently. This sophisticated tech supports various stages of loan processing, including application, underwriting, approval, and disbursement. The core purpose of LOS is to enhance the speed, accuracy, and efficiency of these processes, enabling lenders to handle applications more effectively and provide quicker responses to customers.

LOS integrates several functionalities that are pivotal in the modern lending landscape:

  • Application Processing: It automates the initial stages of gathering and verifying applicant data, significantly reducing manual entry errors and speeding up the process.

  • Credit Scoring and Risk Assessment: The software seamlessly connects with credit bureaus and financial data sources to pull relevant information, helping lenders assess the creditworthiness of applicants efficiently.

  • Automated Underwriting: By applying predefined rules and machine learning algorithms, LOS can make consistent and accurate lending decisions quickly, reducing the dependency on manual underwriting.

  • Document Management and Compliance: LOS helps in managing the multitude of documents associated with loan applications, ensuring they are stored securely and easily accessible. It also keeps track of compliance with ever-changing financial regulations, helping institutions avoid legal pitfalls.

  • Integration with Other Financial Systems: LOS often features robust API connections that allow it to integrate seamlessly with other financial systems within the institution, creating a cohesive and interconnected financial technology ecosystem.

The integration of these functionalities into a single platform simplifies the traditionally complex and fragmented loan application process. It also enhances transparency and accessibility, providing benefits not only to the lenders in terms of operational efficiency but also to the borrowers through faster loan processing and better service delivery.

Key Components of the LOS Framework

The Loan Origination System (LOS) framework consists of several key components, each designed to streamline different aspects of the loan application process. Here’s a breakdown of the key elements that form the backbone of an effective LOS framework:

1. Application Interface

The application interface is the front-end system through which borrowers submit their loan applications. This interface needs to be user-friendly and accessible, often available both online and via mobile platforms, to ensure a smooth application process for customers. It should also be capable of capturing all necessary information required to process the loan, including personal details, financial information, and required documentation.

2. Underwriting Engine

At the core of the LOS framework is the underwriting engine, which automates the decision-making process in loan approvals. This engine utilises predefined rules and machine learning models to assess the risk associated with each loan application. It considers factors such as credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, employment history, and more to determine the applicant’s creditworthiness and appropriate loan terms.

3. Document Management System

A robust document management system is crucial for handling the large volumes of paperwork involved in loan processing. This system stores, manages, and tracks all documents related to each loan application, ensuring that they are easily accessible and safely maintained. It supports document upload capabilities, digital signatures, and compliance checks to streamline document handling and reduce the risk of errors.

4. Compliance Tools

Compliance tools within the LOS framework help ensure that all loan processing activities adhere to relevant laws and regulations, such as the Truth in Lending Act, Fair Lending Laws, and Anti-Money Laundering regulations. These tools automatically update to reflect changes in legislation, providing alerts and reports to help lending institutions maintain compliance at all times.

5. Risk Assessment and Management Tools

Risk management tools integrated into the LOS framework assist lenders in identifying and mitigating risks throughout the loan process. These tools analyze data from various sources to forecast potential issues and provide risk scores, enabling lenders to take proactive measures to mitigate risks before they impact the financial institution.

6. Integration Capabilities

A flexible LOS framework includes robust integration capabilities with other banking and financial systems, such as CRM software, accounting systems, and external data services (like credit bureaus). This integration ensures seamless data flow and enhances efficiency by eliminating the need for manual data entry and reducing the likelihood of data discrepancies.

7. Reporting and Analytics

Advanced reporting and analytics capabilities are essential for monitoring the effectiveness of the loan origination process. These features provide comprehensive insights into application volumes, approval rates, loan performance, and more, helping lenders make data-driven decisions and continuously improve their processes.

8. Customer Relationship Management (CRM)

The CRM component of an LOS framework focuses on maintaining and enhancing customer relationships throughout the loan process. It enables lenders to track customer interactions, manage inquiries and complaints, and provide personalised service, improving customer satisfaction and retention.

Services Provided by AuthBridge to Enhance Loan Origination Software

AuthBridge, recognised for its innovative solutions in verification and compliance, significantly enhances the capabilities of Loan Origination Software (LOS) by integrating a suite of services designed to streamline and secure the lending process. These services address various critical aspects of loan origination, making the system more efficient and reliable. Here’s how AuthBridge supports and elevates LOS:

1. Fraud Verification

AuthBridge’s fraud verification service employs sophisticated algorithms to detect and prevent fraudulent activities at the outset of the loan application process. This proactive approach helps in identifying potential fraud risks based on patterns and inconsistencies in the data provided by applicants, safeguarding financial institutions against complex fraud schemes and financial losses.

2. Bank Statement Analyzer

A critical tool in income verification, AuthBridge’s bank statement analyzer automates the review of applicants’ financial statements. This tool assesses financial stability and spending patterns, providing lenders with detailed insights that support more informed decision-making regarding an applicant’s creditworthiness and loan repayment capacity.

3. Digital Underwriting

Digital underwriting solutions offered by AuthBridge transform the traditional underwriting process. By integrating data analytics and machine learning, AuthBridge’s technology enables more accurate risk assessments. This not only speeds up the underwriting process but also enhances its precision, reducing the likelihood of default and improving loan portfolio quality.

4. E-Signing Services

In the final stages of loan origination, the e-signing services provided by AuthBridge streamline the document signing process. This digital solution facilitates the quick and secure execution of loan agreements, significantly speeding up the process from final approval to fund disbursement, all while ensuring legal compliance and reducing paperwork.

5. KYC and Customer Onboarding

AuthBridge’s KYC and customer onboarding services ensure thorough identity verification and regulatory compliance during the customer acquisition phase. Utilising advanced biometric technology and real-time data checks, these services make the onboarding process more efficient, secure, and user-friendly, enhancing customer experience and trust.

6. Custom Integrations and API Connectivity

Recognising the unique needs of different financial institutions, AuthBridge offers custom integrations that allow its services to seamlessly blend with existing LOS platforms. This adaptability ensures that enhancements can be made without disrupting existing systems, allowing for a tailored approach that meets specific operational needs.

By incorporating these services, AuthBridge not only streamlines various stages of the loan origination process but also introduces an added layer of security and compliance. This comprehensive support helps financial institutions manage their lending processes more effectively, leading to quicker loan approvals, reduced operational risks, and a better customer experience.

The Impact of Integrating AuthBridge Services with LOS

The integration of AuthBridge’s advanced verification and compliance services with Loan Origination Software (LOS) brings transformative benefits to the lending process. By enhancing both the operational efficiency and security aspects of loan origination, AuthBridge helps financial institutions not only streamline their workflows but also bolster their defenses against fraud and compliance risks. Here’s an overview of the significant impacts:

1. Enhanced Efficiency and Speed

By automating critical processes such as income verification, risk assessment, and document verification, AuthBridge significantly reduces the time required for these tasks. The result is a much faster loan processing cycle, enabling lenders to provide quicker responses to applicants. This speed is crucial in today’s competitive lending market, where the ability to offer rapid loan approvals can be a key differentiator.

2. Improved Accuracy and Risk Management

AuthBridge’s services employ cutting-edge technology to ensure that the data used in the loan origination process is accurate and reliable. The fraud detection capabilities, in particular, use sophisticated algorithms to identify potential fraudulent activities before they can affect the institution. Similarly, the digital underwriting tools enhance the accuracy of risk assessments, ensuring that loans are offered based on a thorough understanding of each applicant’s risk profile. This leads to better portfolio quality and lower default rates.

3. Enhanced Compliance and Security

With stringent regulatory requirements governing the financial sector, compliance is a critical concern for lenders. AuthBridge’s KYC and regulatory compliance services ensure that financial institutions remain compliant with local and international laws, reducing the risk of penalties or legal issues. Additionally, the secure e-signing services ensure that all documents are handled in a compliant and secure manner, maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of borrower information.

4. Improved Customer Experience

The integration of AuthBridge’s services with LOS also significantly enhances the borrower’s experience. The efficiencies gained through automation and streamlined processes translate into a smoother, quicker loan application process for customers. Furthermore, the transparency and communication improvements that come with advanced verification and onboarding services help build trust and satisfaction among clients.

5. Scalability and Customization

AuthBridge’s ability to provide custom integrations and tailored solutions allows financial institutions of all sizes to scale their operations effectively. Whether dealing with a high volume of small personal loans or managing complex commercial lending scenarios, lenders can adapt the LOS functionalities to meet their specific needs without significant overhauls or investments in new technologies.

Debunking-Background-Verification-Myths1

Debunking Background Verification Myths – A Closer Look at Common Misconceptions

Introduction

In the dynamic world of business today, background verification (BGV) has emerged as a crucial element in fortifying human resource protocols. Misunderstandings and misconceptions frequently cloud perceptions of this process, often deterring organisations from leveraging its full potential. This article seeks to dismantle some of the most widespread myths about background verification, drawing on robust data and real-world instances to provide a comprehensive perspective. By dispelling these myths, we illuminate how enterprises, regardless of their size, can enhance their hiring strategies through efficient and ethically conducted background checks, thereby securing their operations against unforeseen risks.

Myth 1: Background Verification is Only for Large Corporations

One common misconception is that background verification is a resource-intensive process suited only to large corporations. This myth stems from the perception that only big businesses have the requisite funds and infrastructure to manage comprehensive BGV programs. However, data and real-world examples paint a different picture.

Small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also stand to gain significantly from implementing background checks. A study conducted by the Federation of Small Businesses revealed that SMEs are disproportionately affected by poor hiring decisions, with impacts ranging from financial losses to reputational damage. The report highlights that smaller companies can ill-afford the repercussions of not conducting thorough background checks, contrary to the belief that they can navigate hiring risks without formal verification processes.

Moreover, advancements in technology have democratized access to BGV services, making them affordable and accessible for businesses of all sizes. By debunking this myth, it becomes clear that background verification is not a luxury reserved for the corporate giants but a necessary tool for all businesses aiming to make informed and safe hiring decisions.

Myth 2: BGV Processes are Intrusive and Unethical

A prevalent myth that often circulates within both industry and public perception is that background verification processes are inherently intrusive and unethical. This misconception can deter organisations from adopting these essential security measures, under the mistaken belief that they may infringe on individual privacy or ethical standards.

At AuthBridge, we prioritize ethical practices and compliance with both local and international data protection regulations. The reality is that modern BGV processes are designed with a high regard for personal privacy and are conducted only with the explicit consent of the individual. Ethical background checks are crucial not only for maintaining compliance but also for fostering trust within professional relationships.

For instance, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU and similar regulations in other regions stipulate stringent guidelines for data handling and privacy. AuthBridge adheres to these principles, ensuring that all BGV activities are transparent, accountable, and respectful of individual rights. Our processes are clear: candidates are always informed about what information is being checked, the reasons for these checks, and who will have access to their data.

Moreover, statistical data supports the notion that ethical background checks significantly contribute to safer workplace environments. Research indicates that businesses that conduct thorough and respectful background checks report 30% fewer instances of workplace misconduct compared to those that do not. These statistics not only debunk the myth of intrusiveness but also highlight the protective role that ethical BGV plays in safeguarding both individuals and organisations.

By clarifying that background checks are a matter of safety and compliance, and not an invasive practice, we help reshape the narrative around BGV to reflect its true purpose and value.

Myth 3: BGV is a Lengthy and Cumbersome Process

Another common misconception about background verification is that it is invariably a lengthy and cumbersome process. This belief can cause businesses to hesitate in implementing BGV practices, fearing that it will bog down hiring cycles or require excessive administrative effort.

At AuthBridge, we leverage cutting-edge technology and streamlined workflows to ensure that our background verification processes are as efficient and straightforward as possible. Modern BGV techniques, supported by digital platforms, can significantly reduce the time and complexity traditionally associated with these checks.

For example, by using automated data retrieval systems and integrating with various databases, we can expedite the verification process considerably. Recent statistics from our operations show that over 70% of background checks are completed within one to three business days, debunking the myth of a necessarily prolonged process. Furthermore, the use of mobile applications and online portals allows candidates to submit their documents and track the status of their verifications in real-time, adding a layer of convenience and transparency.

This efficiency is particularly crucial in industries where time-to-hire is a key competitive factor. For instance, in the technology sector, where talent acquisition is fiercely competitive, the ability to conduct quick and thorough background checks can be a significant advantage. AuthBridge’s solutions are designed to support such needs, ensuring that organisations do not miss out on top talent due to outdated notions of BGV timelines.

By challenging this myth, we highlight that background verification, when executed with the right tools and expertise, need not be a barrier to efficient hiring. Instead, it can be a facilitator of robust and swift recruitment practices.

Myth 4: Only Criminal Checks are Important in BGV

It’s a common belief that in background verification (BGV), only criminal checks are crucial, while other forms of verification such as education, employment history, and credit checks are often underestimated. This narrow perspective can lead businesses to overlook critical aspects of a candidate’s background, potentially leading to inadequate hiring decisions.

At AuthBridge, we emphasize the importance of a holistic approach to background verification. While criminal checks are undoubtedly vital for ensuring workplace safety and regulatory compliance, other verification types play equally critical roles in building a comprehensive understanding of a candidate’s profile.

Statistics show that discrepancies in employment history and educational qualifications are surprisingly common. According to a recent study conducted by AuthBridge, approximately 15% of all background checks reveal discrepancies in information provided by candidates. This underscores the necessity of comprehensive background checks, not just limited to criminal records.

By broadening the scope of BGV, companies not only safeguard themselves against potential fraud but also ensure that they are building a workforce that is competent, trustworthy, and well-vetted. This comprehensive approach to background checks ultimately supports stronger corporate governance and a more secure working environment.

Myth 5: BGV Results Can Be Universally Applied Across All Departments

A prevalent but misleading belief is that the results of a background verification (BGV) are universally applicable, implying that once a check is completed for one role or department, it can be seamlessly transferred or reused for other positions within the same company. This misunderstanding can lead businesses to underutilize BGV, potentially compromising the specificity and relevance of the information for different job roles.

At AuthBridge, we recognize that the requirements for background checks can vary significantly based on the nature of the job, the department, and the industry. For example, a financial role may require an in-depth credit and financial history check, whereas positions involving sensitive information might need a more stringent criminal background check. Similarly, roles in education or healthcare could demand specific checks related to professional licenses and certifications.

Reusing background check results without considering the unique requirements of each role can lead to gaps in the verification process. Industry data illustrates that the relevance of specific checks can greatly influence hiring outcomes. For instance, sectors like banking and healthcare have regulatory requirements that necessitate tailored background checks, making it inappropriate to apply a one-size-fits-all approach.

Hi! Let’s Schedule Your Call.

To begin, Tell us a bit about “yourself”

The most noteworthy aspects of our collaboration has been the ability to seamlessly onboard partners from all corners of India, for which our TAT has been reduced from multiple weeks to a few hours now.

- Mr. Satyasiva Sundar Ruutray
Vice President, F&A Commercial,
Greenlam

Thank You

We have sent your download in your email.

Case Study Download

Want to Verify More Tin Numbers?

Want to Verify More Pan Numbers?

Want to Verify More UAN Numbers?

Want to Verify More Pan Dob ?

Want to Verify More Aadhar Numbers?

Want to Check More Udyam Registration/Reference Numbers?

Want to Verify More GST Numbers?