CPV in Banking

Importance Of Contact Point Verification (CPV) In Banking

Introduction To Contact Point Verification In Banking

Contact Point Verification (CPV) is a key step in banking operations, focused on confirming that the communication channels provided by customers. This includes checking for active and authentic mobile numbers, email addresses or postal addresses. By validating these contact points, banks make sure that important alerts such as transaction notifications, OTPs for Internet banking and statements reach the right recipient without delay or interception.

A strong CPV process strengthens security across multiple touchpoints. For Internet-banking log-ins and fund transfers, an OTP sent to a verified number or e-mail ensures that only the genuine customer can approve high-value transactions. In customer onboarding, instant confirmation of email addresses prevents mistyped or fraudulent entries from entering the system. Even routine communications, like sending monthly statements or promotional offers, benefit from CPV. Banks avoid the costs and reputational risks of bounced emails or messages sent to inactive numbers.

Moreover, CPV contributes to operational efficiency. Automated checks, such as carrier lookups to verify number status or SMTP pings to test e-mail server availability, can be completed in minutes. This significantly reduces manual follow-up. When automated channels fail, voice-call or letter-dispatch methods ensure no customer is left unverified. This multi-channel approach enhances the customer experience by minimising onboarding friction. It also reduces the resource burden on call centres and branch staff.

Core Methods And Best Practices For CPV In Banking

In banking, Contact Point Verification relies on a multi-channel strategy to ensure that customer communication details are both valid and in active use. Automated mechanisms, such as carrier lookups and SMTP handshakes, quickly filter out invalid entries. One-time passwords (OTPs) sent via SMS or e-mail provide a near-instant confirmation of possession. While interactive voice response (IVR) calls serve as a secondary digital protection. Where digital channels fail, a manual agent call or postal confirmation letter bridges the gap, ensuring that even customers in low-connectivity regions can complete verification.

A hallmark of an effective CPV programme is its fallback logic: if an SMS OTP isn’t delivered, the system should automatically trigger an IVR prompt or e-mail link without manual intervention. This continuity reduces customer effort and cuts down support overhead. Moreover, all verification attempts and outcomes should be logged in real time to create an audit trail capable of withstanding regulatory scrutiny and forensic review.

Talk to sales - AuthBridge

Banks aiming for excellence in CPV adopt several best practices:

  • Time-Bound Automated Checks: Carrier and SMTP checks are executed within seconds, flagging invalid entries before consuming OTP resources.

  • Dynamic Fallback Rules: The system should escalate only once per failed channel, e.g., one SMS attempt, one IVR attempt, then route persistent failures to a human agent for resolution.

  • Consent Management: Before dispatching any OTP or call, explicit customer consent must be captured and stored by data protection regulations.

  • Periodic Re-Verification: High-risk or dormant accounts should undergo CPV at defined intervals, typically every 12–24 months, to ensure contact information remains current.

Method

Check Performed

Data Captured

Carrier Lookup

Is the mobile number active and valid?

Live/deactivated status, network operator

SMTP Handshake

Does the e-mail server accept incoming connections?

Bounce responses, server latency

SMS OTP

Does the user receive and submit the code correctly?

OTP send time, validation success/failure

IVR Prompt

Does the automated call connect and confirm user?

Call logs, DTMF or voice confirmation result

Manual Agent Call

Can a human agent reach and verify the contact?

Agent notes, final disposition

Postal Letter Dispatch

Does physical mail reach the stated address?

Delivery confirmation or returned mail flag

Regulatory Framework And RBI Guidelines For CPV

The Reserve Bank of India embeds Contact Point Verification into its KYC and CDD norms across these key scenarios:

  • Periodic KYC Updation: When a customer updates only their postal address, the new address must be verified through positive confirmation within two months, by means such as an address-verification letter, contact point verification, deliverables, etc.

  • Sole Proprietorship Documentary Exception: If a sole proprietor cannot furnish two activity-proof documents, the bank may accept one, but only after it undertakes contact point verification … to establish the existence of such firm and satisfy itself that the business activity has been verified from the address of the proprietary concern.

  • Enhanced Due Diligence for Remote Onboarding: Before allowing operations in a non-face-to-face account, banks must confirm the customer’s current address via positive confirmation methods, with CPV listed alongside letters and other deliverables. 

Practical Use Cases And Benefits Of CPV In Banking

Contact Point Verification delivers multiple advantages across a wide range of banking operations, enhancing security, efficiency and compliance.

1. Secure Onboarding and Account Activation

When a new customer applies for a savings or current account, whether in branch or via digital channels, CPV prevents fraudulent or erroneous enrolments. By confirming mobile numbers and e-mail addresses in real time, banks ensure that onboarding credentials (such as Internet-banking log-ins or debit-card PINs) reach bona fide applicants only. This not only reduces the incidence of “dead” or fraudulent accounts but also diminishes manual rework.

2. Safe Transaction Authorisations

High-value fund transfers and bill payments depend on one-time passwords delivered to verified channels. CPV underpins transaction security by ensuring that OTPs cannot be intercepted via stale or spoofed numbers. 

3. Dormancy Reactivation and Periodic Re-Verification

Many customers fall into dormancy, typically after 12 – 24 months of inactivity, raising the risk of unauthorised reactivation. CPV applied at the point of dormancy reactivation (sending OTPs or verification calls) confirms that contact details remain under the customer’s control. 

4. Regulatory Audit and Compliance Reporting

CPV generates a rich audit trail: every carrier-lookup response, OTP dispatch, IVR call log and agent-confirmation note is timestamped and stored. This comprehensive record helps banks demonstrate compliance with KYC Directions and Data Protection norms during inspections. 

Conclusion

In a nutshell, Contact Point Verification is what keeps banking both safe and straightforward: by quickly checking that your phone number, email or address is yours, whether through a simple OTP, a quick automated call or a brief manual check, banks stop fraudsters in their tracks, avoid endless back-and-forth during sign-up, and stay on the right side of RBI rules. It’s a small step that makes a big difference, building customer trust and setting the stage for banking that’s as seamless as it is secure.

Moonlighting fraud

How One Software Engineer Deceived Multiple Startups Simultaneously

Moonlighting fraud in the tech world has been gaining attention, but a new case has brought this issue to the forefront in a way no one expected. The tale of how one individual deceived multiple startups by secretly working at several companies simultaneously is a wake-up call for all businesses. This blog will walk you through the details of the scam, its widespread impact, and what companies can do to avoid falling victim to similar deceptive practices.

How A Talented Engineer Became a Serial Moonlighter

Soham Parekh, an Indian software engineer, had an impressive resume that made him a preferred candidate for several top-tier US-based startups. With a degree from the University of Mumbai and a master’s from Georgia Tech, he looked like the ideal hire. His skills in backend development, cloud services, and full-stack engineering were just what many fast-growing companies were looking for.

However, behind his perfect CV was a fraud waiting to be unearthed. Parekh secretly held multiple roles simultaneously, working at various companies concurrently. He convinced employers he was committed to each job while dividing his time and attention between multiple full-time roles. His charm during interviews made him a standout, but his split focus meant none of his employers were getting the full value of their hire.

The First Red Flag: An Unusual Termination

The first sign that something was not quite right came when Suhail Doshi, co-founder of Mixpanel, hired Parekh. Doshi was initially impressed by Parekh’s performance, but things quickly started to reveal themselves. After just one week at Playground AI, Doshi found that Parekh’s work ethic was lacking. Parekh was distracted, unreliable, and unable to fully commit to the tasks at hand. Doshi’s suspicions grew, and after further investigation, he realised Parekh had been moonlighting at other startups while working for him.

Within a week, Parekh was let go. But Doshi wasn’t done yet. After his own experience, he felt the responsibility to warn other tech entrepreneurs who might fall into the same trap.

How Did This Moonlighting Scam Get Exposed?

Suhail Doshi didn’t keep his suspicions to himself. He decided to go public, posting on a popular social media platform to warn others in the startup community. His posts quickly went viral, shedding light on the extent of the fraud.

In one of his posts, Doshi shared Parekh’s resume and called out the discrepancies he’d found. He went as far as to claim that 90% of Parekh’s resume was likely fake. He had tried to give Parekh a second chance, hoping the techie would change, but it was clear that the fraud continued unabated.

Doshi’s posts served as a call to action for other startup founders. His transparency led to a slew of discoveries from other businesses that had been similarly deceived.

The Massive Extent Of The Moonlighting Scam

As Doshi’s posts gained traction, more startup founders came forward to share their experiences with Soham Parekh. Nicolai Ouporov, CEO of Fleet AI, confirmed that Parekh had been juggling multiple jobs at once. He wrote, “He’s been doing this for years.”

Matthew Parkhurst, CEO of Antimetal, also shared his experience, revealing that he had hired Parekh in 2022 but quickly realised something was off. “Soham was our first engineering hire… We realized quickly that he was working at multiple companies and let him go.”

Justin Harvey, co-founder of AIVideo, explained how Parekh nearly secured a position at his company: “He crushed the interview. We were THIS close to hiring him.” But the revelations from Doshi’s posts led Harvey to reconsider, preventing the company from making a costly mistake.

Why Moonlighting Fraud Is More Dangerous Than It Seems

While some might argue that moonlighting is just an unfortunate consequence of the gig economy, Parekh’s actions went beyond mere moonlighting. He was actively deceiving his employers, manipulating the system for personal gain, and misleading multiple startups into believing he was working exclusively for them.

The problem isn’t with employees having side jobs, but with deceitful moonlighting, where individuals take on multiple full-time jobs without informing their employers. This situation is particularly dangerous for startups, where each hire is a vital part of the team’s success. When someone is working for several companies at once, the consequences can include:

  • Reduced productivity: An employee split between several roles can’t give their full attention to any single company.

  • Security risks: Sensitive information can be mishandled, especially if the employee has access to multiple company systems.

  • Trust issues: The lack of transparency breeds distrust, which can harm team dynamics and morale.

What Can Employers Learn From This Moonlighting Scam?

The case of Soham Parekh has brought moonlighting fraud into sharp focus, forcing companies to confront a growing risk in the hiring process. So, what should employers take away from this scandal?

First and foremost, due diligence in the hiring process is essential. Employers must verify not just resumes but also the employment history of potential hires. They must look for signs of potential deception, such as inconsistent timelines or overlapping job roles.

Additionally, it’s crucial to set clear policies around secondary employment and encourage transparency in the workplace. Employees should feel comfortable disclosing any outside work they might be involved in, especially if it affects their performance or commitment to the company.

How AuthBridge Can Help Prevent Similar Scams

AuthBridge offers a powerful solution to ensure that companies are hiring employees who are committed and trustworthy. By integrating background verification tools into the hiring process, businesses can significantly reduce the risk of hiring someone involved in moonlighting fraud.

  • Employment History Checks: AuthBridge thoroughly verifies an applicant’s employment history, ensuring that claims of previous employment are legitimate.

  • UAN Verification: Verifying the Universal Account Number or UAN details can highlight instances of dual employment, revealing whether an individual is secretly working for multiple employers.

  • Form 26AS Checks: This check helps employers cross-check an employee’s income tax details to verify employment claims and spot inconsistencies.

  • AI-Powered Anomaly Detection: AuthBridge uses AI to analyse employment patterns and flag any irregularities that might indicate deceptive practices like moonlighting.

Conclusion

The Soham Parekh scam highlights a serious threat in today’s job market. As remote work becomes more prevalent, it’s easier for individuals to hide dual employment, causing major risks to businesses. The tech industry, in particular, is vulnerable, as many startups rely on a small team of trusted individuals.

Employers must act now to protect themselves. By using tools like AuthBridge’s background verification services, businesses can ensure that they are hiring dedicated, trustworthy employees who are committed to their roles. Implementing strong verification processes will help prevent fraud and ensure that your company is not the next victim of a moonlighting scam.

Hi! Let’s Schedule Your Call.

To begin, Tell us a bit about “yourself”

The most noteworthy aspects of our collaboration has been the ability to seamlessly onboard partners from all corners of India, for which our TAT has been reduced from multiple weeks to a few hours now.

- Mr. Satyasiva Sundar Ruutray
Vice President, F&A Commercial,
Greenlam

Thank You

We have sent your download in your email.

Case Study Download

Want to Verify More Tin Numbers?

Want to Verify More Pan Numbers?

Want to Verify More UAN Numbers?

Want to Verify More Pan Dob ?

Want to Verify More Aadhar Numbers?

Want to Check More Udyam Registration/Reference Numbers?

Want to Verify More GST Numbers?