KYC and AML

KYC and AML Differences, Regulations & Importance

Introduction

In an era defined by digital finance, cross-border transactions, and sophisticated criminal networks, the need for strong Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) frameworks has never been greater. Across jurisdictions, regulators are tightening compliance mandates, expecting financial institutions to do more than simply identify customers—they must also understand risk, detect anomalies, and report suspicious activity in near real time.

Globally, organisations such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have been instrumental in shaping a uniform compliance culture. Their frameworks influence regulatory policies in regions ranging from the European Union and North America to Asia-Pacific and Africa. However, the application of these guidelines remains a local responsibility, executed under domestic laws and supervisory bodies.

In India, this global alignment is visible through legislations like the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, and directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and SEBI, which mirror many FATF principles while addressing region-specific challenges such as informal cash economies and Aadhaar-based verification.

According to a joint report by Refinitiv and ACAMS, over 72% of compliance professionals globally cited the increasing complexity of AML regulations as a primary challenge in 2023. This is compounded by rising transaction volumes, customer onboarding expectations, and the growing sophistication of money laundering typologies involving cryptocurrencies, shell entities, and digital assets.

What Is KYC And Why Is It Important?

Know Your Customer (KYC) is a critical component of the broader Anti-Money Laundering (AML) framework. It refers to the processes organisations use to verify the identity and credentials of their clients, ensuring they are legitimate and not linked to criminal activities. This practice is not limited to financial institutions; it extends to industries such as insurance, real estate, and even emerging sectors like cryptocurrency exchanges.

Talk to sales - AuthBridge

The Broader Compliance Framework: Foundations of AML And KYC

AML and KYC regulations are not standalone mandates—they form part of a broader financial crime compliance ecosystem designed to protect the integrity of financial systems and prevent the misuse of legitimate channels by bad actors. Whether applied by global banks, regional fintechs, or regulated market intermediaries, these frameworks draw their structure from globally accepted standards and are enforced by domestic regulators.

At the international level, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has been the principal body shaping AML/KYC policy since its formation in 1989. Its recommendations—currently numbering 40—serve as a blueprint for member countries in developing risk-sensitive regulations around customer onboarding, ongoing due diligence, beneficial ownership transparency, and reporting obligations. Over 200 jurisdictions, including India, are committed to these standards.

The AML/KYC compliance framework typically spans several stages:

  1. Customer Identification and Verification (CIP) – Establishing the identity of a client using government-issued IDs, biometric checks, or digital credentials.

  2. Customer Due Diligence (CDD) – Assessing the risk profile of the client based on factors such as occupation, geography, transaction behaviour, and entity type.

  3. Transaction Monitoring – Continuously reviewing customer transactions for suspicious behaviour or anomalies that may indicate laundering activity.

  4. Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR/STR) – Filing reports with the appropriate regulatory authority when potential financial crime is detected.

  5. Recordkeeping and Audit Trails – Maintaining detailed logs of client verifications and financial activities for regulatory inspection and enforcement.

In India, these stages are embedded within frameworks such as the KYC Master Directions by the Reserve Bank of India, SEBI’s intermediary compliance guidelines, and reporting requirements set by FIU-IND. Globally, similar structures exist within the European Union’s AML Directives (AMLD), the United States’ Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), and the UK’s Money Laundering Regulations (MLR).

While the terminology and reporting thresholds may vary across regions, the objective remains consistent: to identify and mitigate the risk of money laundering, terrorism financing, and fraud before it undermines public trust or economic stability.

Differences Between KYC and AML

AspectKYC (Know Your Customer)AML (Anti-Money Laundering)
DefinitionA process of verifying the identity and credentials of customers.A broader framework of laws, regulations, and measures to prevent money laundering and related crimes.
ScopeFocuses on individual customer identification and verification.Covers a wide range of activities, including monitoring financial transactions, detecting suspicious activities, and enforcing compliance.
PurposeEnsures customers are genuine and reduces risks of fraud.Prevents and detects the flow of illicit funds and financial crimes.
Key ActivitiesCollecting personal information (e.g., ID proof, address proof), verifying documents, and onboarding customers securely.Enforcing regulations, investigating suspicious transactions, and reporting to authorities.
Regulatory FocusA critical part of AML, specifically targeting customer onboarding.Encompasses KYC and includes other measures like transaction monitoring and risk management.
ImplementationConducted by financial institutions during account opening or onboarding.Mandated for organizations to establish a system of checks to monitor and report illicit financial activities.
Primary UsersBanks, financial institutions, online platforms, and telecom providers.Governments, regulatory bodies, law enforcement agencies, and financial institutions.
ExamplesVerifying a customer’s Aadhaar, PAN, or passport for account creation.Monitoring large transactions, detecting unusual patterns, and flagging potential money laundering cases.

Due Diligence: Balancing Regulatory Expectations with Operational Realities

Due diligence lies at the heart of any AML/KYC framework. It ensures that organisations not only know who they are doing business with but also understand the context in which those individuals or entities operate. Regulatory bodies across the globe—from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)—mandate that financial institutions apply varying degrees of scrutiny based on assessed risk. This approach not only enhances compliance but also improves operational efficiency by avoiding unnecessary delays for low-risk customers.

There are three generally accepted tiers of due diligence, each with a specific scope and application:

1. Customer Due Diligence (CDD)

This is the standard verification level applied to the majority of customers. It typically involves collecting and validating basic identity documents, proof of address, and checking names against government and international watchlists. CDD is sufficient for individuals and businesses considered low to moderate risk.

2. Simplified Due Diligence (SDD)

Used in cases where the risk of money laundering is demonstrably low—such as in the provision of certain financial products or services with restricted functionality—SDD involves minimal checks and is often pre-approved by regulators. However, this tier is used sparingly and with caution.

3. Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)

Reserved for high-risk clients, EDD entails a much deeper verification process. This includes detailed checks on the source of funds, ultimate beneficial ownership (UBO), geographical risk factors, and adverse media screening. Entities requiring EDD often include politically exposed persons (PEPs), offshore corporations, and businesses operating in jurisdictions with weak AML controls.

For instance, if an Indian fintech firm onboards a client with operations in a FATF grey-listed country, the RBI guidelines may require that firm to undertake enhanced due diligence, including tighter monitoring and documentation reviews.

Risk-Based Approach: A Shift From Rule-Based Compliance To Risk Intelligence

Traditional compliance frameworks often operated on rule-based systems—treating every customer and transaction with the same degree of scrutiny, regardless of actual risk. While effective in maintaining procedural uniformity, such models proved inefficient, resource-intensive, and prone to false positives. The global shift towards a risk-based approach (RBA) marked a turning point in how organisations detect, respond to, and prevent financial crime.

Introduced formally in FATF’s revised guidelines in the early 2000s and now embedded in the compliance directives of most national regulators, including the Reserve Bank of India and the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), a risk-based approach compels institutions to prioritise efforts based on risk exposure rather than mere transaction volume or account type.

At its core, RBA revolves around three pillars:

  1. Customer Risk Profiling: Customers are categorised as low, medium, or high-risk based on parameters such as geography, source of funds, business sector, transaction behaviour, and legal structure. For instance, a politically exposed person (PEP) with ties to a high-risk jurisdiction will require far more scrutiny than a salaried individual with a domestic account.

  2. Tailored Due Diligence: Depending on the risk category, different levels of due diligence—ranging from standard CDD to Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)—are applied. These include verification of beneficial ownership, deeper source of wealth checks, and adverse media scans.

  3. Ongoing Risk Reassessment: A customer’s risk profile is not static. Changes in activity patterns, location, or affiliations may elevate risk and trigger additional verification or monitoring measures. RBA supports dynamic compliance rather than one-time onboarding checks.

The advantage of RBA lies in its efficiency and intelligence. It allows compliance teams to focus their resources where the risk is highest, improving detection while reducing friction for low-risk users. Moreover, with the integration of AI and analytics platforms, many financial institutions can now automatically assign and update risk scores in real time, streamlining compliance and accelerating onboarding without compromising security.

For Indian organisations, this shift is increasingly relevant as regulators encourage the adoption of AI-led risk scoring models and API-driven verification systems. Institutions that embed RBA into their AML/KYC practices not only reduce exposure to financial crime but also demonstrate greater regulatory maturity and operational scalability.

Regulatory Mapping: Built for Compliance in India and Beyond

Our AML-KYC solutions are purpose-built to meet regulatory expectations across major frameworks:

Regulatory BodyRequirementHow AuthBridge Supports
RBIKYC Master Directions (2023)eKYC, CKYC integration, offline KYC
FIU-INDSuspicious Transaction Reports (STRs), CTRsAutomated red-flagging and reporting workflows
SEBIIntermediary KYC and broker complianceAPI-based identity and financial verifications
PMLA, 2002Anti-Money Laundering recordkeeping & due diligenceFull audit trails and case management support

Why Choose AuthBridge for Your KYC AML Needs?

AuthBridge helps businesses meet AML and KYC compliance requirements with smart, automated solutions that are built for speed, accuracy, and scalability. By integrating cutting-edge technologies like AI-driven identity verification, liveness detection, and facial matching, we help businesses onboard customers seamlessly while maintaining high regulatory standards.

For AML, our solutions go beyond just compliance; they offer robust tools to detect and prevent financial crimes. From real-time transaction monitoring to risk profiling, we provide actionable insights that protect your business while reducing the operational burden of manual checks.

With AuthBridge, B2B clients can focus on growth and customer experience, knowing that their compliance processes are fast, reliable, and always audit-ready. Whether you’re looking to streamline customer onboarding, safeguard against fraud, or build trust at scale, AuthBridge ensures you’re always a step ahead.

  • 150+ Checks across identity, background, and financials

  • Real-time verification APIs for banks, NBFCs, fintechs

  • Compliant with RBI, PMLA, SEBI & FATF directives

  • Custom workflows tailored for every risk segment

  • Integrated dashboards, audit trails & alerts

FAQs around KYC and AML

KYC (Know Your Customer) is the process banks use to verify the identity of their customers to prevent fraud, financial crimes, and identity theft. It involves collecting and verifying documents such as ID proofs, address details, and financial history.

AML (Anti-Money Laundering) refers to the policies and procedures designed to prevent, detect, and report money laundering activities. This includes monitoring transactions for suspicious activity, conducting due diligence, and complying with regulatory requirements.

AML (Anti-Money Laundering) is a broader framework aimed at preventing financial crimes like money laundering, encompassing activities such as monitoring transactions and reporting suspicious behavior. KYC (Know Your Customer) is a subset of AML, focused specifically on verifying customer identities, understanding their financial activities, and assessing associated risks. While KYC builds the foundation, AML addresses a wider scope of regulatory compliance to combat illicit financial activities.

The 5 stages of KYC (Know Your Customer) are:

  1. Customer Identification: Collecting and verifying identity details like name, address, and government-issued ID.
  2. Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Assessing the customer’s risk profile based on gathered information.
  3. Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Performing deeper checks for high-risk customers or unusual transactions.
  4. Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitoring customer activity for suspicious patterns or changes.
  5. Record Maintenance and Reporting: Maintaining records of KYC data and reporting any suspicious activities to regulatory authorities.

The AML process prevents and detects money laundering by:

  1. Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Verifying customer identity and risk via KYC.
  2. Transaction Monitoring: Detecting suspicious activity.
  3. Screening: Checking against sanction lists, PEPs, and adverse media.
  4. Reporting: Filing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs).
  5. Compliance Training: Educating employees on AML policies.
  6. Audits: Ensuring regulatory compliance.

KYC AML documents are records used to verify identity and assess risk in compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. They typically include:

  1. Identity Proof: Passport, driving license, Aadhaar, or national ID.
  2. Address Proof: Utility bills, bank statements, or lease agreements.
  3. Business Documents (for entities): Registration certificates, ownership proof, and tax identification.
Telecom Cyber Security Rules 2024

DoT Notifies New Telecom Cyber Security Rules 2024: Key Highlights

India’s telecommunications sector is the backbone of the country’s digital economy, connecting billions of users daily. However, with this vast network comes the growing challenge of crimes, cyber threats and scams, such as phishing attacks and fraud schemes like “digital arrests,” which exploit gaps in telecom security to deceive unsuspecting users.

The Department of Telecommunications, under the Ministry of Communications, notified the Telecom Cyber Security Rules, 2024 on November 21, 2024, to tackle these issues. These rules provide a detailed framework to protect telecom networks from cyberattacks, ensure the responsible use of telecom equipment, and prevent the misuse of telecommunication services for scams and fraudulent activities. The government aims to strengthen public trust and create a safer telecom environment for all by holding telecom operators accountable and mandating robust security measures.

These rules also target the loopholes that allow bad entities to manipulate telecom systems. The new rules set strict guidelines for operators, introduce rapid reporting mechanisms for security incidents, and require companies to adopt advanced cyber security practices, ensuring a proactive approach to threats.

Key Highlights Of The Telecom Cyber Security Rules, 2024

The Telecom Cyber Security Rules, 2024, set a detailed framework to enhance the safety and resilience of India’s telecommunications infrastructure. These rules address a variety of challenges by introducing stringent security measures, clear reporting mandates, and increased accountability for telecom entities. Below are the key highlights:

Comprehensive Cyber Security Policies

Telecom operators are required to establish a robust cyber security policy. This policy must focus on key areas, including:

  • Risk Management: Implementing measures to identify vulnerabilities and prevent potential risks.
  • Network Testing: Conducting vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, and hardening of telecom networks.
  • Incident Response: Establishing rapid action systems to mitigate the impact of breaches.
  • Forensic Analysis: Investigating incidents to strengthen defences and prevent future occurrences.

Appointment Of Chief Telecommunication Security Officers (CTSOs)

Every telecom entity is mandated to appoint a Chief Telecommunication Security Officer (CTSO). The necessary conditions needed to satisfy anyone who is to be appointed as a CTSO are:

  • Be a citizen and resident of India.
  • Oversee the implementation of the telecom cyber security framework.
  • Coordinate with the government on compliance and security-related matters.

This role ensures dedicated oversight and accountability within each telecom organisation.

Reporting Cyber Security Incidents

Timely reporting of security incidents is a cornerstone of these rules. Telecom operators must:

  • Notify the government within six hours of identifying a security breach.
  • Submit a detailed report within 24 hours, including:
    • Number of users affected.
    • Geographical scope and duration of the incident.
    • Mitigation steps were taken to address the issue.

The government may disclose incidents in the public interest or direct telecom operators to undertake remedial measures and audits.

Data Collection And Analysis Protocols

The government or authorised agencies are empowered to collect and analyse telecom data (excluding message content) for enhancing cyber security. Key requirements include:

  • Telecom Operators’ Obligations: Establish infrastructure to collect and share data with the government from designated points.
  • Data Analysis: Use the collected data to identify risks and take preventive measures.
  • Confidentiality Safeguards: Ensure strict protection against unauthorised access to sensitive information.

Provisions For Telecommunication Identifiers And Equipment

To address misuse of telecommunication equipment and identifiers:

  • Registration Requirements: Manufacturers and importers must register equipment identifiers such as IMEI numbers with the government before sale or import.
  • Tampering Prohibition: Altering or misusing identifiers is strictly prohibited.
  • Blocking Measures: Telecom entities may block devices with tampered identifiers to prevent misuse.

Establishment Of Security Operations Centres (SOCs)

Telecom operators must establish Security Operations Centres (SOCs) to monitor and address cyber security threats. The SOCs will:

  • Track security incidents, breaches, and intrusions.
  • Maintain detailed logs of operations, threats, and response measures.
  • Support government investigations by providing necessary data.

The establishment of SOCs is a significant step toward creating a proactive defence mechanism within telecom networks.

Repository Of Suspended Identifiers

The government will maintain a repository of telecom identifiers that have been suspended or disconnected due to violations of cyber security rules. Entities linked to these identifiers may face:

  • Access Restrictions: Being barred from telecom services for up to three years.
  • Wider Compliance Measures: The repository may also be shared with other service providers to prevent misuse.

Oversight And Compliance

The government holds the authority to:

  • Conduct security audits of telecom entities through certified agencies.
  • Issue directives for implementing security measures within stipulated timelines.
  • Enforce compliance mechanisms through a digital platform, ensuring telecom operators report and adhere to guidelines efficiently.

Impact Of The Telecom Cyber Security Rules, 2024

The Telecom Cyber Security rules are not just about compliance; they aim to create a safer and more resilient telecom environment for operators and users alike. Let’s look at what they mean for the industry and the people it serves.

Building Stronger Defences for Telecom Operators

Telecom companies will now have to adopt robust cyber security measures, including regular network testing, risk assessments, and detailed action plans for handling security incidents. These requirements are designed to prevent misuse and enhance the security of telecom services. As the rules state, “Every telecommunication entity shall ensure compliance with the directions and standards… for ensuring telecom cyber security.”

By implementing these measures, telecom operators will be better equipped to handle modern cyber threats, minimising the risk of service disruptions or data breaches.

Clear Accountability Through Dedicated Cyber Security Officers

One of the standout features of the new rules is the mandatory appointment of a Chief Telecommunication Security Officer (CTSO) in every telecom organisation. This officer will be responsible for implementing security policies, coordinating with the government, and ensuring compliance.

Having a dedicated person for this role ensures accountability and gives companies a clear point of contact for all security-related matters. It’s a practical step toward improving how security is managed within the sector.

Faster Responses To Threats

The new rules introduce strict timelines for reporting security breaches. Telecom operators must notify the government within six hours of identifying an incident and provide a detailed report within 24 hours.

This quick reporting framework ensures that potential threats are addressed before they escalate, helping prevent widespread disruptions. Additionally, the government’s ability to direct further audits or investigations adds an extra layer of scrutiny to make sure incidents are handled thoroughly.

Protecting Data And Preventing Misuse

Data privacy is a key concern addressed by these rules. While the government or authorised agencies can collect and analyse certain types of telecom data to enhance security, the rules clearly state, “Any data so disseminated or shared shall not be used for any purpose other than for ensuring telecom cyber security.”

This clause reassures users that their personal information won’t be misused, fostering trust in the telecom ecosystem.

Stamping Out Fraudulent Activities

With stringent regulations on telecom equipment identifiers, such as IMEI numbers, the government is cracking down on the misuse of telecom devices. Manufacturers and importers must now register these identifiers before selling or importing devices. Additionally, tampering with or altering identifiers is strictly prohibited, and such devices can be blocked from accessing networks.

These measures will go a long way in tackling issues like fraudulent device usage and unauthorised network access.

Proactive Monitoring With Security Operations Centres

Telecom companies are now required to set up Security Operations Centres (SOCs) to monitor and manage cyber threats. These centres will handle tasks like tracking security incidents, analysing threats, and maintaining detailed logs to support investigations.

This step ensures that telecom operators are not just reacting to threats but actively working to prevent them. It’s a proactive approach that strengthens the overall resilience of telecom networks.

Empowering Users And Boosting Trust

For users, these rules are a big win. By holding telecom operators accountable for their security practices, the government is ensuring a safer digital environment. Whether it’s protecting personal data or ensuring uninterrupted service, these measures are designed with user safety in mind.

The Telecom Cyber Security Rules, 2024, send a strong message: India’s telecom industry is committed to staying one step ahead of cyber threats. These regulations not only address today’s challenges but also prepare the industry for the risks of tomorrow.

Conclusion

For telecom operators, the rules signal a shift toward proactive security management. Measures like mandatory security policies, the appointment of Chief Telecommunication Security Officers, and the establishment of Security Operations Centres will not only protect their networks but also enhance their ability to respond to threats swiftly and effectively.

For users, the new framework promises greater trust and safety. By prioritising data protection and ensuring the integrity of telecom services, the government has reaffirmed its commitment to creating a secure digital environment.

Moreover, these rules are forward-looking, addressing current vulnerabilities while anticipating future challenges in an increasingly interconnected world. With the telecommunications sector forming the backbone of India’s digital economy, these measures are not just about security—they’re about enabling growth and innovation on a strong foundation of trust and resilience.

FAQs on the Telecom Cyber Security Rules, 2024

Cyber Security Group under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India is the governing body of cyber security in India.

CERT stands for Computer Emergency Response Team. 

These rules establish a legal framework for enhancing and ensuring telecom cyber security in India, including policies, safeguards, and measures for secure telecommunication networks and services.

The rules came into effect on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette, November 21, 2024.

All telecommunication entities, including service providers, network operators, equipment manufacturers, and importers, are covered.

  • Report incidents to the Central Government within 6 hours of detection.
  • Submit detailed reports within 24 hours, including user impact, geographical scope, and remedial actions taken.

The CTSO is responsible for coordinating with the government on cyber security compliance and incident reporting. The officer must be a citizen and resident of India.

The government can collect traffic and other data (excluding message content) to enhance cyber security, with safeguards for confidentiality and unauthorized access prevention.

Collected data is stored securely, shared only for telecom cyber security purposes, and subject to strict confidentiality safeguards.

Identifiers include International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) numbers, Electronic Serial Numbers (ESNs), or other unique signals used to identify telecom equipment.

  • Manufacturers must register IMEI numbers with the Central Government before sale.
  • Importers must register IMEI numbers prior to importing equipment into India.

Tampering, altering, or using fraudulent telecommunication identifiers is strictly prohibited.

Yes, the government can temporarily suspend or permanently disconnect identifiers if they pose a cyber security risk.

Tampering is a punishable offense, and the equipment may be blocked from telecom networks or services.

Entities must maintain logs and records for a period specified by the government, which may extend up to three years.

Hi! Let’s Schedule Your Call.

To begin, Tell us a bit about “yourself”

The most noteworthy aspects of our collaboration has been the ability to seamlessly onboard partners from all corners of India, for which our TAT has been reduced from multiple weeks to a few hours now.

- Mr. Satyasiva Sundar Ruutray
Vice President, F&A Commercial,
Greenlam

Thank You

We have sent your download in your email.

Case Study Download

Want to Verify More Tin Numbers?

Want to Verify More Pan Numbers?

Want to Verify More UAN Numbers?

Want to Verify More Pan Dob ?

Want to Verify More Aadhar Numbers?

Want to Check More Udyam Registration/Reference Numbers?

Want to Verify More GST Numbers?